Page 75 of 76 FirstFirst ... 256573747576 LastLast
Results 741 to 750 of 756

Thread: Uvalde, Texas elementary school shooting: 19 children, 2 teachers killed

  1. #741
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,751
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Its almost like I tried to warn people about this very thing more than a year ago.

    https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread...t-your-friends
    Forward Ascertainment Group

  2. #742
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,445
    Feedback Score
    0
    It just gets worst…

    A cop had the killer in his rifle sights as he approached the school entrance, and asked his superior for permission to shoot- and the killer got into the school before he could shoot.

    At this point, the killer had already been shooting, right? Why would the cop need authority to shoot?

    So we either have cops that shoot anything, or cops that won’t shoot at all.

    Just when you couldn’t get any more depressing…
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  3. #743
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    745
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by FromMyColdDeadHand View Post
    It just gets worst…

    A cop had the killer in his rifle sights as he approached the school entrance, and asked his superior for permission to shoot- and the killer got into the school before he could shoot.

    At this point, the killer had already been shooting, right? Why would the cop need authority to shoot?

    So we either have cops that shoot anything, or cops that won’t shoot at all.

    Just when you couldn’t get any more depressing…
    I have people argue with me that there is never a reason that police should ever shoot someone in the back. This is the exact example I have given for years, armed violent suspect trying to get into a school or church. I usually say knife instead of gun though, and that usually causes them to freak out a bit more because…”it’s not like they have a gun.”

  4. #744
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Eastern NC
    Posts
    8,732
    Feedback Score
    88 (100%)
    https://alerrt.org/reading

    Scroll to the bottom for what I believe is the most detailed and relevant analysis yet. Its very straight forward but as you might expect, there are difficult parts.
    Sic semper tyrannis.

  5. #745
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Eastern NC
    Posts
    8,732
    Feedback Score
    88 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by john armond View Post
    I have people argue with me that there is never a reason that police should ever shoot someone in the back. This is the exact example I have given for years, armed violent suspect trying to get into a school or church. I usually say knife instead of gun though, and that usually causes them to freak out a bit more because…”it’s not like they have a gun.”
    This was a mil context but I was taught that back to you WITH weapon in hand just meant maneuvering for a better position to continue firing on you or your buddies. Doesn’t feel like it should be any different for LE.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Sic semper tyrannis.

  6. #746
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,445
    Feedback Score
    0
    He had already been shooting at people at this point, correct? Even if not, someone walking towards a school with a rifle? I know it would be hard to shoot someone, but even in that circumstance- not taking the shot? Shoot him in the back? Fair fights are for suckers.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  7. #747
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,485
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)


    This was forwarded to me by a friend in MUNICH, of all places...
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  8. #748
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Eastern NC
    Posts
    8,732
    Feedback Score
    88 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post


    This was forwarded to me by a friend in MUNICH, of all places...
    The 40 minutes to enter the building is false…


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Sic semper tyrannis.

  9. #749
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    745
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Wake27 View Post
    This was a mil context but I was taught that back to you WITH weapon in hand just meant maneuvering for a better position to continue firing on you or your buddies. Doesn’t feel like it should be any different for LE.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Sounds pretty similar, with the added "civilian" (for lack of a better term) context.

    I remember one instructor telling us of a class he used to put on where he had responding officers go to a domestic call. As they were nearing the front door, they could hear a woman screaming and loud banging. As soon as you opened the door there was a woman (dummy) laying on the ground on her back with her face covered in blood and a man with his back to you, on his knees straddling the woman with a raised cast iron skillet in his hands. He said the number of people that wouldn't shoot the man in the back was pretty high. He had people try to tackle the man, some just yell, and some that actually entered the building to get in front of the man before they shot him. As these officers were doing this the man was slamming the skillet into the woman's head. Only a few would shoot the man in the back from the onset.

    This was way before tasers were being carried, but even now, a taser probably wouldn't be the best solution.

  10. #750
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,855
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post


    This was forwarded to me by a friend in MUNICH, of all places...
    Willeford and Langendorff certainly stepped up when needed.

    Sounds like the cops in that locale are a lot better bunch than Uvalde. Somehow I doubt that segment of the event would have went down the same way with Uvalde area cops.

    https://www.texasmonthly.com/article...s-mass-murder/

Page 75 of 76 FirstFirst ... 256573747576 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •