Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 58

Thread: Repubs considering waiting period for 18- to 20-year-olds purchasing guns

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    2,272
    Feedback Score
    0

    Repubs considering waiting period for 18- to 20-year-olds purchasing guns

    https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/07/us/fi...rnd/index.html

    Leading Republican senators involved in gun talks on Capitol Hill have signaled that it's unlikely Congress will raise the age requirement for purchasing semi-automatic firearms from 18 to 21, instead saying they are looking at changing the criminal background check system. GOP Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina yesterday said officials are considering a waiting period of sorts for 18- to 20-year-olds purchasing semi-automatic guns, which he said could be "two to three weeks minimally" potentially to scour juvenile records. But he added Senate negotiators are looking at ways for gun purchasers to appeal for expedited processes. Separately, Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia -- the Senate's most conservative Democrat -- voiced his support yesterday for raising the age to 21 for purchasing semi-automatic weapons and questioned why individuals need to own high-powered AR-15-style guns.
    Religion is doing what you are told no matter what is right. Morality is doing what is right no matter what you are told...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    805
    Feedback Score
    0
    I agree, 18 year olds aren't responsible enough to buy/own an AR-15. They also aren't responsible to enlist in the military, or vote and those ages should be raised accordingly as well.

    Sent from my SM-A326U using Tapatalk

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    803
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Hush View Post
    I agree, 18 year olds aren't responsible enough to buy/own an AR-15. They also aren't responsible to enlist in the military, or vote and those ages should be raised accordingly as well.

    Sent from my SM-A326U using Tapatalk
    What about consent for sex?if a 21 YO taps a 18 YO? Statutory?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    4,618
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hush View Post
    I agree, 18 year olds aren't responsible enough to buy/own an AR-15. They also aren't responsible to enlist in the military, or vote and those ages should be raised accordingly as well.
    How many votes would Dems lose if the voting age was raised to 21?

    What if we add mandatory education, training, and vote-storage requirements too?

    Asking for a friend.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,234
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by tn1911 View Post
    https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/07/us/fi...rnd/index.html

    Leading Republican senators involved in gun talks on Capitol Hill have signaled that it's unlikely Congress will raise the age requirement for purchasing semi-automatic firearms from 18 to 21, instead saying they are looking at changing the criminal background check system. GOP Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina yesterday said officials are considering a waiting period of sorts for 18- to 20-year-olds purchasing semi-automatic guns, which he said could be "two to three weeks minimally" potentially to scour juvenile records. But he added Senate negotiators are looking at ways for gun purchasers to appeal for expedited processes. Separately, Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia -- the Senate's most conservative Democrat -- voiced his support yesterday for raising the age to 21 for purchasing semi-automatic weapons and questioned why individuals need to own high-powered AR-15-style guns.

    I don't vote for any party that supports Gun Control. Proceed at your own peril Repubs.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    9,930
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by tn1911 View Post
    https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/07/us/fi...rnd/index.html

    Leading Republican senators involved in gun talks on Capitol Hill have signaled that it's unlikely Congress will raise the age requirement for purchasing semi-automatic firearms from 18 to 21, instead saying they are looking at changing the criminal background check system. GOP Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina yesterday said officials are considering a waiting period of sorts for 18- to 20-year-olds purchasing semi-automatic guns, which he said could be "two to three weeks minimally" potentially to scour juvenile records. But he added Senate negotiators are looking at ways for gun purchasers to appeal for expedited processes. Separately, Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia -- the Senate's most conservative Democrat -- voiced his support yesterday for raising the age to 21 for purchasing semi-automatic weapons and questioned why individuals need to own high-powered AR-15-style guns.
    LOL, yeah right. This is just smoke and mirrors to give the RINO cucks cover for voting against the Constitution, because this doesn't put money in their pockets. Manchin and Toomey are chomping at the bit to get their pet anti-gun legislation passed. We can all cheer Manchin when he's blocking Biden, but this isn't one of those cases.
    What if this whole crusade's a charade?
    And behind it all there's a price to be paid
    For the blood which we dine
    Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Wisco
    Posts
    2,277
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SomeOtherGuy View Post
    How many votes would Dems lose if the voting age was raised to 21?

    What if we add mandatory education, training, and vote-storage requirements too?

    Asking for a friend.
    ^^^This, we should move everything up if 18 year olds are not old enough, if we give an age for one right in the constitution we need to give the same age to them all
    Dr. Carter G. Woodson, “History shows that it does not matter who is in power or what revolutionary forces take over the government, those who have not learned to do for themselves and have to depend solely on others never obtain any more rights or privileges in the end than they had in the beginning.”

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,519
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    If they really cared about kids, they would raise the age to use social media to 21.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Wisco
    Posts
    2,277
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Inkslinger View Post
    If they really cared about kids, they would raise the age to use social media to 21.
    Agreed. Someone in Colion Noir's comment section brought up a good point: They're going to try and sue DD for this kid having their rifle, but why not sue the government for them passing a background check.
    Dr. Carter G. Woodson, “History shows that it does not matter who is in power or what revolutionary forces take over the government, those who have not learned to do for themselves and have to depend solely on others never obtain any more rights or privileges in the end than they had in the beginning.”

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    I'm from everywhere man because I'm an everywhere man....
    Posts
    769
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hush View Post
    I agree, 18 year olds aren't responsible enough to buy/own an AR-15. They also aren't responsible to enlist in the military, or vote and those ages should be raised accordingly as well.

    Sent from my SM-A326U using Tapatalk
    "Them" say that, but then say that infants are mature enough to determine if they want a sex/gender change. Freakin' world is getting turned up side down.
    Repression Is Nine Tenths The Law

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •