Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: The Z-M Weapons LR-300

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,423
    Feedback Score
    76 (100%)

    The Z-M Weapons LR-300











    I figured that I would share a few pictures of my Z-M Weapons LR-300. This is one of the original, older versions, which has a very distinctive style. During this time, Z-M made several minor changes throughout production, and this is one of the very earliest versions. After these, they made later versions with rails and modern features, and eventually sold the rights to Para USA, which was briefly marketed as the Para TTR.

    I bought this a while ago in a 16" configuration, and was able to source the rail, grip, stock, and 11.5" barrel, mostly from the designer, Allan Zitta himself.

    I've added some features to make it a little more modern feeling and to reduce wear on the irreplaceable receivers... not "correct", but whatever. Strike Industries charging latch (still considering other latch options), Geissele G2S, KNS pins, Lantac can pin, LWRC safety, POF bolt catch, and of course, the Surefire Scout and ACOG.

    As you can see here, the Tritium iron sights are usable through the ACOG carry handle channel, which I think is really cool. The Tritium in the sights is pretty much depleted, which is a shame.
    The sights being placed forward on the receiver is a very distinctive Z-M style, and actually works well for quick shooting. The rear sight adjustment is, however, absolutely terrible.



    The bolt carrier group is a cut down AR15 BCG with extended gas key. The action spring is retained with a small clip at the front of the gas tube, and the charging handle inserts straight into the receiver. It is, unfortunately, unique to the LR300 and therefore not swappable.






    At the end of its travel, the rear of the BCG impacts a synthetic rubberized buffer pressed into the rear of the receiver. When I first got this, the original buffer was dry rotted and crumbled apart. I replaced it with one made of a much more modern material that should last longer than humanity.
    There was also some slop between the receivers that I fixed with an AccuWedge bought from Brownells. Very interestingly, it is branded Z-M Weapons, just like the rifle. A match made in heaven.




    This rifle is very fun to shoot, has a unique "bark" sound when fired (mostly due to the brake that I'm using), has low recoil, and can be shot with the stock folded. The stock has 5 positions, I like it on position 2.
    The rifle is fairly heavy, despite its short length. This seems to be due to the beefy construction, although the barrel is pencil profile. It balances nicely.
    The ergonomics are actually excellent, and the grip is extremely comfortable, despite the strange look.

    Here are a few older evolutionary pictures.







    Hopefully you enjoyed these pictures and details.
    This gun was a childhood favorite of mine, and served as the base for many fictional sci-fi guns, such as the Killzone M82. It was also featured in many video games, such as STALKER, and movies, such as Knight and Day.

    If you'd like to know or see anything else, feel free to ask.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,917
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Wow. That's a trip back in time. I remember seeing those on the covers of many gun magazines. Pretty cool.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,423
    Feedback Score
    76 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by markm View Post
    Wow. That's a trip back in time. I remember seeing those on the covers of many gun magazines. Pretty cool.
    Yeah it's such a cool rifle that I really wish was still being manufactured. I think that it would be relatively popular now, if they would make it in a configuration similar to the original; the later, more "tactical" styled versions never really looked all that great.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    38
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have great memories of Jerry Barnhart running one with an early HOLOsight when attending classes with him in the late 90s.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    9,925
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by PJ2RESQU2 View Post
    I have great memories of Jerry Barnhart running one with an early HOLOsight when attending classes with him in the late 90s.
    Mention of “The Burner” does bring back memories! Did Todd Jarrett ever run one for Para after they bought the rights? I remember shooting Todd’s LDA and that trigger was crazy! LOL
    What if this whole crusade's a charade?
    And behind it all there's a price to be paid
    For the blood which we dine
    Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    139
    Feedback Score
    0
    Al Zitta is a great guy. Have had mine for years.....thanks for posting!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    33,999
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    I remember those, I remember wanting one real bad. But I always thought they were a Bushmaster product, not sure why. Might be confusing them with that original Bushmaster.

    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    34
    Feedback Score
    0

    Z-M LR-300

    Wow, thanks for the pictures and bit of history regarding the LR-300. The only time I saw one in the wild was when visiting a pretty well known federal agency back in the late 90's who had one for T & E purposes. Unless I'm mistaken the one I handled was full auto and it had a shorter barrel. Between the way it handled and the folding stock I was convinced it was a step forward from the M-4 of the day. Never fired it but had the heft and compactness that said it was a serious weapon. Appreciate your sharing.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2022
    Posts
    5
    Feedback Score
    0
    Just got mine yesterday. Shes a beauty. Although i noticed the depth of my "buffer tube" seems to be about twice as deep as yours. It feels like theres a piece of hard rubber inside and it fired beautifully. Am i missing a buffer in my stock? I have the other style of stock than you so i dont know if its set up different.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,423
    Feedback Score
    76 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rickdangerk View Post
    Just got mine yesterday. Shes a beauty. Although i noticed the depth of my "buffer tube" seems to be about twice as deep as yours. It feels like theres a piece of hard rubber inside and it fired beautifully. Am i missing a buffer in my stock? I have the other style of stock than you so i dont know if its set up different.
    Sorry for missing this!
    Yes there is supposed to be a rubber buffer in that space, and the size is critical; it must be exactly right, to prevent the gas key from impacting the receiver during rearward stroke.
    Post pics of your rifle and the buffer area in the stock, I can help you get a buffer if needed.
    Last edited by masakari; 07-17-22 at 19:42.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •