I am still working on optics for ARs and am looking to upgrade my current 1-4 Accupower. The main problem I have with that scope is the reticle is not daylight bright and is too fine/not bold enough. The reticle is keeping the gun out of the HD safe, in fact.
I would like to have a LPVO more akin to a RDS at 1x and struggle with a non-magnified optic much past 50-100 meters.
Scope will be mounted on a GP 16" AR and max range would be 300 M with the majority of shooting 200 M and in. The reticle must work with a weaponlight.
I have been eyeing the TR 24 for years now, it seems to have proven itself durable and the triangle post reticle seems ideal for my needs. Best price is $650-700. It may be fair to say they are a bit dated.
On the other hand, the PST Gen II seems to have better glass, a usable reticle, daylight bright reticle, and is $150-200 less. It is much heavier, though, and requires a battery.
I would grab a 1-6 Trijicon TR25, but I could practically buy 2 PSTs for the same price, and the same goes for a Razor, NF, etc.
If you had to choose between the TR 24 (red triangle) and the PST II 1-6, which would you pick?
Thank You
Andy
P.S. I understand that a RDS and LPVO at 1X are not the same animal. Current AR optics are AP Pro, MRO, Trijicon Accupower 1-4, Nikon Black 1-4, PST 2.5-10x32.
Bookmarks