Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 119

Thread: If SCOTUS is ruling on NYSPA v Bruen it’ll happen this Tuesday or Thursday.

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,421
    Feedback Score
    0
    Scotusblog seems to be the best place to get what is coming out, but with the EPA, ROE and Gun case, I think that the details of the decisions will take a bit to parse out.

    So no ROE case it sounds like- which is criminal. Should have been released already to tamp out the overt security risk.

    Thomas ruling still possible, so let’s hope he un-wraps a corker in the NYC case- strict scrutiny for gun gases, b!tches….
    Last edited by FromMyColdDeadHand; 06-21-22 at 09:28.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,421
    Feedback Score
    0
    So, in the big picture long term, is it Goresuch that is going to go lefty?
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Location
    AR
    Posts
    541
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by FromMyColdDeadHand View Post
    So, in the big picture long term, is it Goresuch that is going to go lefty?
    I think he may be Libertarian.
    "It is only the warrior who chooses pacifism. All others are condemned to it."

    "Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem."
    Dangerous Freedom over Peaceful Slavery.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,421
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by P2Vaircrewman View Post
    Line by line analysis of the 2nd.

    http://www.largo.org/literary.html
    Really interesting. It’s pretty clear to anyone that is objective what the wording means.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    2,272
    Feedback Score
    0
    #SCOTUS calendar now indicates that, in addition to tomorrow, the justices will also release opinions in argued cases at 10 am on Friday.

    9:13 AM · Jun 22, 2022·TweetDeck

    https://twitter.com/ahoweblogger/sta...kB3bV3Pn4BvR0Q
    Religion is doing what you are told no matter what is right. Morality is doing what is right no matter what you are told...

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    1,556
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    I think they're gonna wait until the last possible second to release the Roe and NYSPA rulings then go into hiding for the remainder of the summer. Like one foot out the door then "oh, btw, Row is overturned and y'all can get permits...Byeeeeee" then disappear like the Roadrunner leaving behind a Kavanaugh shaped puff of dust.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2022
    Posts
    279
    Feedback Score
    0
    I am not expecting g anything worthy, just to make the year a total cheese grater

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,421
    Feedback Score
    0
    I hope the Justice is realize that if the Final opinion is in anyway less than the leaked Alito opinion, The justices will have people screaming and showering at their front doors every time there is a leftist cause before the court. If the lefties get in their mind that they can get into the minds of the justices we have forever changed how people will approach the court.

    No matter what the decision around CCW is for the New York case, what I’m really hoping is that they put in there that all of these gun right cases need to be decided by the strict scrutiny standard, not the intermediate that allows them to basically make the second amendment meaningless.

    That way the crazy nights and all of these other circuits that are looking at assault weapons bands and magazine restrictions are put on notice that they better do this right are there going to get smacked hard. At the very least we should get at least a few circuits following the Scotus prescription, and the cases should go pretty fast up the ladder with disagreeing circuits.
    Last edited by FromMyColdDeadHand; 06-22-22 at 19:20.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    5,152
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by FromMyColdDeadHand View Post
    I hope the Justice is realize that if the Final opinion is in anyway less than the leaked Alito opinion, The justices will have people screaming and showering at their front doors every time there is a leftist cause before the court. If the lefties get in their mind that they can get into the minds of the justices we have forever changed how people will approach the court.

    No matter what the decision around CCW is for the New York case, what I’m really hoping is that they put in there that all of these gun right cases need to be decided by the strict scrutiny standard, not the intermediate that allows them to basically make the second amendment meaningless.

    That way the crazy nights and all of these other circuits that are looking at assault weapons bands and magazine restrictions are put on notice that they better do this right are there going to get smacked hard. At the very least we should get at least a few circuits following the Scotus prescription, and the cases should go pretty fast up the ladder with disagreeing circuits.
    If the left can do it, meaning intimidate the court, we should to.

    Even if the court strikes down NYs "proper cause" and there by states like NJ's "justifiable need" nothing will change in those states. If it does it will take years, especially in NJ. They will just make the law requiring 120 hours of training but the training is only offered by the state on the 5th Sunday of an odd numbered month and cost $6500 per student.
    I am part of that power which eternally wills evil, and eternally works good.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    9,603
    Feedback Score
    47 (100%)
    What is, “becoming a domestic terrorist, Alex?”

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex V View Post
    If the left can do it, meaning intimidate the court, we should to.

Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •