Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Stunned by UFOs, ‘exasperated’ fighter pilots get little help from Pentagon

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    2,273
    Feedback Score
    0

    Stunned by UFOs, ‘exasperated’ fighter pilots get little help from Pentagon

    https://thehill.com/opinion/national...from-pentagon/

    In April 2014, four naval aviators narrowly escaped disaster. Just as they entered highly controlled airspace for a training exercise, their two F/A-18F fighter jets nearly collided with an unidentified flying object (UFO). To the frustration of dozens of their fellow aviators, such a near-catastrophe was inevitable.

    For months before and after the incident, aircrews flying in “exclusive use” training areas off the U.S. East Coast frequently observed unknown objects exhibiting highly anomalous flight characteristics. Despite the collision hazard posed by the UFOs, aviators lacked a formal mechanism to report the mysterious objects.
    In one UFO incident, an aviator reported that he had “never seen anything like this before.” In another encounter, an aviator “noticed an object with flight characteristics unlike anything I had seen in my [redacted] years of [redacted]” — implying a particularly anomalous encounter.

    Yet another pilot’s report states that “she had never seen [redacted] like it… [the UFO] did not change position like an aircraft would and was too high to be a ship.”

    For fighter pilots armed with an array of advanced sensors, the confusion and bewilderment reflected in the reports is striking. One aviator “had a difficult time explaining the [redacted].” In another incident, a pilot could only describe a UFO “in a puzzled voice” over the radio. Yet another aviator described a UFO that “appeared, as odd as it sounds, to be [redacted].”
    Pointing to several accounts in which aviators appear to methodically rule out mundane explanations for their UFO encounters, Graves told me, “To the best of their ability, these men and women are not putting their balloon sightings on this form. They are ruling [prosaic explanations] out, as much as they can.”
    For his part, Graves remains puzzled about the strange objects that he and his fellow aviators observed hovering in place — irrespective of wind — or flying at several hundred miles per hour for remarkably long periods of time.

    According to Graves, “We’d go on a flight in the morning, they’d be out there. You go on a flight in the evening, they’re out there. … They were pretty much always there when we went out there.”
    But the mystery only deepens as Graves recalls the shape of the objects observed by aviators off the East Coast. One of the pilots involved in the 2014 near-collision described the UFO as a dark cube inside of a clear sphere, with no wings or obvious means of propulsion.

    A few years after the 2014 incident, a test pilot flying in a nearby area told Graves of an encounter with such an object. According to Graves, a cube-in-a-sphere UFO was “just riding along with him,” about 30 feet from the aircraft, before it “zipped off.”
    Religion is doing what you are told no matter what is right. Morality is doing what is right no matter what you are told...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    803
    Feedback Score
    0
    One day

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,060
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Clearly visitors from the Planet Kamikaze.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    9,577
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    Clearly visitors from the Planet Kamikaze.
    Looking for a new crib.
    https://www.science.org/content/article/kamikaze-planet
    Gettin' down innagrass.
    Let's Go Brandon!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,060
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by titsonritz View Post
    God I hate "pop" science. So much speculation in that article we might as well declare it inhabited by advanced life forms. The thing about the tidal bulge is 100% assumption since it would be impossible to directly observe anything like that or infer it from the transit as it passes in front of the star.

    I'm going to postulate it is made entirely from molten copper but has a frozen hollow core which is inhabited by an advanced species who are experts in refrigeration.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    9,577
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    God I hate "pop" science. So much speculation in that article we might as well declare it inhabited by advanced life forms. The thing about the tidal bulge is 100% assumption since it would be impossible to directly observe anything like that or infer it from the transit as it passes in front of the star.

    I'm going to postulate it is made entirely from molten copper but has a frozen hollow core which is inhabited by an advanced species who are experts in refrigeration.


    I just had to "google" Planet Kamikaze and see what goofing shit would come up. Tada.
    Gettin' down innagrass.
    Let's Go Brandon!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,060
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by titsonritz View Post


    I just had to "google" Planet Kamikaze and see what goofing shit would come up. Tada.
    The sad part is you didn't link to "radical sciencey ideas.com" but to science.org, and if they are going to go all Carl Sagan and live in speculative science worlds, they need to start your sentences with "We can imagine if..." and "Perhaps even..." Carl Sagan engaged in speculative science most of his life (which doesn't even meet the criteria for "theory") yet he was more factually based than most of what gets passed around as "scientific discovery" these days.

    The bar has been lowered so far we might as well go ahead and validate the "evidence" for UFOs as alien visitors. After all we are literally at "this is what we think we saw and this is what we think it means so might as well go ahead and declare it proven."
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •