Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: FBI's 1987 handgun testing

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,098
    Feedback Score
    0
    I don't think the document mentions it, but I wonder what generation Glocks were used in the testing? This being 1987, presumably Gen 1 or 2?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,234
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by flenna View Post
    The wonder round of the 1990s, the .40 S&W, came out of it since the FBI wanted their 10mm rounds downloaded.
    They got their 10mm rounds downloaded with the 1076. Federal Made a 180gr@950 fps just for them. S&W figured out they could put that load in a shorter case and and a standard frame, and called it 40S&W. FBI would be one of last to adopt 40S&W in the 90s, not moving to it until 1997 or so.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    803
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    They got their 10mm rounds downloaded with the 1076. Federal Made a 180gr@950 fps just for them. S&W figured out they could put that load in a shorter case and and a standard frame, and called it 40S&W. FBI would be one of last to adopt 40S&W in the 90s, not moving to it until 1997 or so.
    They had to get professional enough first.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    District 11
    Posts
    6,349
    Feedback Score
    24 (100%)
    I was around back then (I was in HS, but I spent my weekends with my buddies who worked at the biggest local gunship). The Glock had a few rough patches in the 80s. It was a new gun from new (to guns) company. I have no reason to believe the malfunctions from the Glocks were faked. Back then every gunshop was filled with the sounds of guys behind the counter explaining away Glock malfunctions with "limp-wristing."

    Glock addressed most of the issues in various "product improvement" recalls in 90, 92, 93. It was easier to keep your reputation clean before the internet. These recalls addressed issues like "The slide locking back on a full magazine, Failure to lock into battery because the barrel lug drags on the slide lock, . The magazine follower tips or sticks in the magazine tube, unintentional discharges when dropped, etc. James either doesn't know about these developments or his Glock sponsorship is clouding his judgement.

    Don't get me wrong, I ADORE the Gen 5 Glock and think it is basically perfect. But those first years were pretty rough.
    Let those who are fond of blaming and finding fault, while they sit safely at home, ask, ‘Why did you not do thus and so?’I wish they were on this voyage; I well believe that another voyage of a different kind awaits them.”

    Christopher Columbus

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,081
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by The Dumb Gun Collector View Post
    I was around back then (I was in HS, but I spent my weekends with my buddies who worked at the biggest local gunship). The Glock had a few rough patches in the 80s. It was a new gun from new (to guns) company. I have no reason to believe the malfunctions from the Glocks were faked. Back then every gunshop was filled with the sounds of guys behind the counter explaining away Glock malfunctions with "limp-wristing."

    Glock addressed most of the issues in various "product improvement" recalls in 90, 92, 93. It was easier to keep your reputation clean before the internet. These recalls addressed issues like "The slide locking back on a full magazine, Failure to lock into battery because the barrel lug drags on the slide lock, . The magazine follower tips or sticks in the magazine tube, unintentional discharges when dropped, etc. James either doesn't know about these developments or his Glock sponsorship is clouding his judgement.

    Don't get me wrong, I ADORE the Gen 5 Glock and think it is basically perfect. But those first years were pretty rough.
    I bought a Gen 1 back in 1987 and never had any problems with it other than hating the trigger.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Location
    Southern Maryland
    Posts
    479
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    Absolutely correct, after the 1986 Miami shootout they were moving completely away from 9mm and .38 spcl and towards .45 and then 10mm. Platt and Matix changed the FBI in a day.
    At first they blamed the 9mm. Because a good hit did not stop Platt. So they eventually went to a 10mm, then a .40, then now back to the 9mm. Go figure.
    Sic Semper Tyrannis

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,100
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Harpoon View Post
    At first they blamed the 9mm. Because a good hit did not stop Platt. So they eventually went to a 10mm, then a .40, then now back to the 9mm. Go figure.
    Tactics, procedures & training? "Naw...not us...we're the FBI...Winchester built bad bullets..yup..that's what ruined our day...nothing else...fault of the vendor..."

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,081
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Harpoon View Post
    At first they blamed the 9mm. Because a good hit did not stop Platt. So they eventually went to a 10mm, then a .40, then now back to the 9mm. Go figure.
    While defensive ammo did exist in 1986, there has been improvement since then. But tactics and expectations are a big part of their failure that day. It literally became a training scenario so many mistakes were made.

    One could say the change to 45/10/40 was related to the changes in mindset.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    21,920
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    While defensive ammo did exist in 1986, there has been improvement since then. But tactics and expectations are a big part of their failure that day. It literally became a training scenario so many mistakes were made.

    One could say the change to 45/10/40 was related to the changes in mindset.
    I think it's important to stress those improvements were considerable and based on the protocols of the FBI after that event. The understanding of terminal ballistics is much more advanced today, so more effective for stopping goblins.
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com

    LE/Mil specific info:

    https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/

    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3,960
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Harpoon View Post
    At first they blamed the 9mm. Because a good hit did not stop Platt. So they eventually went to a 10mm, then a .40, then now back to the 9mm. Go figure.
    F==king Bunch of Idiots, blame the hardware and not the tactics.

    Since the FBI has got involved in ammo testing they for sure did everyone a favor as all ammo is better. But I think they also stopped round development, in dictating the ideal penetration and expansion.

    Maybe some calibers if not aiming for the FBI standards, could even be better than they are. I wonder if some calibers have been held back.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •