Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32

Thread: Why aren’t there more OTMs in 5.56

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Lowcountry, SC.
    Posts
    6,239
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by mark5pt56 View Post
    For what it's worth, chasing an extra 50-75 fps isn't worth the potential problems.
    while I generally agree, the spread between different brands of factory 75/77 gr ammo is a little over 200fps. I assume each brand uses different powder, so arrives at a different “node” for production.
    RLTW

    “What’s New” button, but without GD: https://www.m4carbine.net/search.php...new&exclude=60 , courtesy of ST911.

    Disclosure: I am affiliated PRN with a tactical training center, but I speak only for myself. I have no idea what we sell, other than CLP and training. I receive no income from sale of hard goods.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,641
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by 1168 View Post
    while I generally agree, the spread between different brands of factory 75/77 gr ammo is a little over 200fps. I assume each brand uses different powder, so arrives at a different “node” for production.
    Referencing factory AND reloaders who chase velocity only "trying to beat the wind" I get it, fast efficient bullet is the way but the difference in a safe and accurate load and one blowing primers and not as accurate is what I referenced.
    GET IN YOUR BUBBLE!

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    Posts
    8,741
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by 1168 View Post
    while I generally agree, the spread between different brands of factory 75/77 gr ammo is a little over 200fps. I assume each brand uses different powder, so arrives at a different “node” for production.
    Point of reference, same 16" barrel, both 77 SMKs
    Federal TRU T223M3, 2380
    Mk262 Mod 1, 2630

    BHA 62 TSX, 16"
    5.56, 2900
    .223, 2770

    Looked for a 55 weight class difference, but I remember that the 55 GDSP 5.56 (d/c) and .223 were about that far apart too.

    The difference in the TRU and 262 matters, start stretching them out (800-1000+) and the difference really shows.
    2012 National Zumba Endurance Champion
    الدهون القاع الفتيات لك جعل العالم هزاز جولة الذهاب

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,641
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    I will say this and it was a one time experience, MK262 in a .223 LTR proves the over pressure hole in the receiver works rather well. Worst sound I ever heard and took a few minutes to make sure I wasn't leaking anything. I didn't know any better and then learned the difference in chambers and pressures.

    Maybe it was a fluke, but I won't test the theory again.
    GET IN YOUR BUBBLE!

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Midland, Georgia
    Posts
    2,062
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    National Match shooters will normally shoot a 68-77 grain bullet at 200 and 300 yards, and an 80 at 600.

    There were a few years where the Marine chain of command told their teams no 80-grainers for the long lines (600 yards for the National Match Course and for the Palma Course fired with a service rifle at 800-900-1000 yards) because single-loaded ammo is not a standard military item.

    The Marines gave away a LOT of points and lost. Often. Good for the Army.

    While Army was shooting 80s and 7.62, Marine 77s would get to 1,000 having passed through trans-sonic and into sub-sonic speed. At Quantico we watched as one went "Blat" through the target, hit the impact berm, bounced back up-range and landed on the catwalk, spinning like a little top.

    A young Marine bent down to pick it up for a souvenir, then dropped it, howling. That thing was only a second out of a rifle at around 55K psi pressure and heat.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Eastern NC
    Posts
    8,726
    Feedback Score
    88 (100%)
    So all of this reloading discussion is going way over my head. I’m in the Rockies of moving from CO to NC right now and transporting my guns and factory ammo alone fills up most of my Grand Cherokee. I can’t imagine adding reloading components on top of that.

    As for the question on what we’re using to determine 5.56/.223, I was only referring to what they’re marked on the box from the factory. But the driving point behind the question was due to bullet drop and ability to fight wind. Shooting at 600m with the winds that can whip through the CO plains is not easy for someone that’s pretty much brand new to it.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Sic semper tyrannis.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,917
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by sinister View Post
    A young Marine bent down to pick it up for a souvenir, then dropped it, howling. That thing was only a second out of a rifle at around 55K psi pressure and heat.
    I've often wondered about some of our lower velocity bullets past 1000 yards.... if the extended flight time cooled the bullet much.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    1,332
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    No it won't cool the bullet enough to touch it. It was only flying for a second, metal doesn't cool that fast. I have grabbed tons of pistol slugs right after shooting steel and without a glove its funny pretty quickly.

    That federal velocity of 2380 FPS from a 16" barrel is why I got into reloading in the first place. I dont want to pay big dollars for neutered rounds. It might shoot good 100 yard groups, but shit will you notice your holding higher than any other load if you actually shoot 500 yards or more.

    I recently changed my reloading mindset. I used to make loads well above any published book max, but once I got a few blown primers in my lower and realized I was only hurting my precious creed moor brass I looked for Nodes at or slightly below max.
    Tactical Nylon Micro Brewery

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,917
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by turnburglar View Post
    No it won't cool the bullet enough to touch it. It was only flying for a second, metal doesn't cool that fast.
    I was wondering about flights well over 1 second. But maybe there's some principles of physics beyond my knowledge that are at play.

    I recently changed my reloading mindset. I used to make loads well above any published book max, but once I got a few blown primers in my lower and realized I was only hurting my precious creed moor brass I looked for Nodes at or slightly below max.
    I've gone to small rifle primer Creedmoor brass for that reason. Hornady standard/large primer pockets actually hold up pretty good though. I run hornady pretty hot and have had 3-4 loads in some of it.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    in the back of your mind
    Posts
    163
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    The reports I was seeing with the 41 primers popping was with some of the new wiz bang cartridges using small rifle primers. Part of what was found out was the brass was soft and less internal capacity than previous batches. At least with one guy anyway. Several other I seen were using 223 and popping primers. One was blanking, the other was blowing pockets. The one with the pockets posted and never came back to update.

    My take on this is everything made in the last 2 years is suspect. QC no matter who it is get compromised when mad $ is to be made in big corporations.

    As an example. I just got a bag of starline 556 brass to try. Local place had them. Got them home and they all measure 1.742"-1.746". I have not weighed them as I have them loaded up already for testing. This is the first time I have ever bought 223/556 brass. I normally use range brass for everything.

    Another example, I have had 2 BA barrels and 2 Wilson Arms barrels I have sent back as they have bad chambers, bores with voids in the rifling. These were in the last year.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •