Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: having a hard time picking an ACOG

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    893
    Feedback Score
    0
    rob_s & USMC03, thank you. you've both been very helpful. USMC03, i hope you get your shoulder healed so you can AAR your T&E findings with the TA33-8 for everyone

    last newbie ACOG question.: i'm going to be using an LT mount on a flat top upper no matter what i pick. do i have to pick a "flat-top ready" version of the ACOG with the 1913 adapter (TA51 mount), or will the carry-handle style work with the LT mount as well?

    also, i ASSume the BDC is identical between the carry handle and flat top versions of the same ACOG model. is this correct?
    Last edited by Parabellum9x19mm; 12-23-08 at 10:01.
    TUEBOR

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Culpeper, VA
    Posts
    6,313
    Feedback Score
    26 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by rob_s View Post
    As long as I kept up with it, the BAC worked reasonably well for me and I didn't have any problems with targets at contact distance out to 130+. If you forget, however, at close range and close one eye you can easily wind up tagging a non-threat or losing your place in line after a reload. The real lesson here is that BAC requires a fair amount of sustainment training to be effective and the "skill" perishes very quickly if not kept up.
    Rob could you go over BAC. I think there is a lot of misunderstanding about what it does and doesn't do. I use it, but I'm not sure I understand how to explain it properly.

    My understanding has been that the reticle works as an OEG for snap shooting during movement/CQB, and then when static, your eye/brain will choose the magnified image for stable, more precise shots but I'm sure that's imperfect.
    Last edited by Gutshot John; 12-23-08 at 10:08.
    It is bad policy to fear the resentment of an enemy. -Ethan Allen

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE FL
    Posts
    14,148
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Parabellum9x19mm View Post
    rob_s & USMC03, thank you. you've both been very helpful. USMC03, i hope you get your shoulder healed so you can AAR your T&E findings with the TA33-8 for everyone

    last newbie ACOG question.: i'm going to be using an LT mount on a flat top upper no matter what i pick. do i have to pick a "flat-top ready" version of the ACOG with the 1913 adapter (TA51 mount), or will the carry-handle style work with the LT mount as well?

    also, i ASSume the BDC is identical between the carry handle and flat top versions of the same ACOG model. is this correct?
    At least with the compacts, which is where the majority of my experience lies by a long shot, you want the carryhandle base as the Larue mount is made to mimic a carry handle with a channel for the ACOG to ride in and a bolt hole to secure it with.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE FL
    Posts
    14,148
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Gutshot John View Post
    Rob could you go over BAC. I think there is a lot of misunderstanding about what it does and doesn't do. I use it, but I'm not sure I understand how to explain it properly.

    My understanding has been that the reticle works as an OEG for snap shooting during movement/CQB, and then when static, your eye/brain will choose the magnified image for stable, more precise shots but I'm sure that's imperfect.
    that's more or less it.

    here is Trijicon's official answer.

    Personally, I tend to close one eye at distance and leave both eyes open close up, so I'm not using the BAC "correctly", strictly speaking.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    13,143
    Feedback Score
    0
    Let's say I'm at 6000ft ASL, along with bullet choice (from XM193 to something like a 77gr .223 PRVI load), out of a 16 inch barrel, how is that going to affect the accuracy of the reticle? Does it really matter?

    I read the JP article about his custom reticle, and that is really intesting, but I'd like a lit reticle.

    Had a hard time with the model numbers, finally came up with.

    TA31: 3+1=4power
    TA33: 3s= 3 power
    TA11: the one I can't come up with a numer-monic for so it is 3.5

    At least H stands for Horseshoe
    Last edited by FromMyColdDeadHand; 12-23-08 at 13:03.
    I just did two lines of powdered wig powder, cranked up some Lee Greenwood, and recited the BoR. - Outlander Systems

    I'm a professional WAGer - WillBrink /// "Comey is a smarmy, self righteous mix of J. Edgar Hoover and a gay Lurch from the "Adams Family"." -Averageman

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    East Texas
    Posts
    28
    Feedback Score
    0

    Practice

    I practice target acquisition thru my ACOG scopes all the time: moving/stationary, short/long range, large/small sizes. I do this daily or at least a few days per week, whether i am live-fire or dry-fire. I even have a cheap 4x30 that I keep in my truck and I routinely scope while out and about. The more you look thru the scope, the better you will get. I personally feel in my bones that civilization's collapse is coming before I am a grandpa and I am a freak about drills and readiness. The learning curve with my ACOG 3x was not automatic.

    I choose the ACOG 3x/3.5x for all scenarios. It handles most distances, but I really don't won't anyone close, so I expect 75+ meter shots, much shorter distances are very easy with practice. I sometimes spend hours of my day walking around the house and property scoping and acquiring various targets w/ a mounted TA33 with Red Chevron. The eyes-thru-optic-to-target visual learning curve was not and is not natural to me or anyone I know, but it becomes nearly instinctive after lots of practice and a few headaches. Practice! Whatever you get, practice with it every day until you become one with it. Merry Christmas.

    PS. If you are losing your young man vision, which I haven't yet, or you can't figure it out, stick with iron sites or a shotgun.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    893
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rangertab1 View Post
    PS. If you are losing your young man vision, which I haven't yet, or you can't figure it out, stick with iron sites or a shotgun.
    i lost my young man vision when i was about 12, i'm afraid. i'm pretty used to glasses at this point.

    i started out with irons when i was in the service. we had M2 M68 CCOs as well, so most of my trigger time is on irons and RDS. i have some EOs and aimpoints on some of my ARs already.

    also, i have a couple telescopic sights on two ARs as well, but they are both variables. this is my first time trying to pick an ACOG (or other fixed power telescopic). i have a little time behind the TA31F, but that is all.

    right now its back to my original pick, the TA33. i think i am going to have to go with a flat top version, because the carry handle versions don't seem to have BDC reticules.

    its looking like the TA33-8 right now, but i'll probably change my mind 15 more times before i actually drop the pesos on the sight.

    still confused why you'd recommend i pick up a shotgun instead of a carbine if i don't have great eyes tho? does having bad eyes somehow turn the shotgun into an effective combat weapon?
    Last edited by Parabellum9x19mm; 12-24-08 at 00:07.
    TUEBOR

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    East Texas
    Posts
    28
    Feedback Score
    0

    Shotguns and age

    Parabellum, sounds like you got a great knowledge/experience base on optics. I spent a lot of time using other's optics before I committed to the TA33 ACOG. I am a whore. The 3x and 3.5x ACOG are the best all around on the market, so far, for me. Durable, no battery, cover most distances. My only desire is that I had crosshairs.

    Eyesight is key and I mention shotguns cause alot of guys dismiss them, especially when they have no business wasting money, time and blood on a rifle due to deficiencies, including poor vision. 12gauge with 00buckshot are king at close range where I come from and they forgive many of our aiming/reflex defects.

    Sounds like you are above average in experience so you will make the right choice. The optic decision dillema is a bitch and I try not to 'what if' my decision. I won't even shoot with anyone elses optics anymore because I don't won't to doubt. I like to see guys wrestle with the choice, cause it is not/should not be an easy one. There is lots to think about. You can only bring one to a fight, so I stick with my choice.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •