Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Chrome lining question

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,075
    Feedback Score
    0

    Chrome lining question

    Below is one of PSA's current advertisements (20 inch rifle) with an FN barrel. This states:

    "In addition, the chrome process for the bore allows for a lining almost twice as thick as a standard M16 for enhanced durability."

    Is this accurate for FN or just more hyperbole from PSA?


    https://palmettostatearmory.com/20-c...m_content=8818
    Last edited by Slater; 07-26-22 at 15:38.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,907
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Well PSA was getting those FN made barrels with double chrome lining a while back... So it's very plausible.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    64
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have a PSA upper with a mid-length FN double chrome barrel. Shoots like a laser.

    No reason to think that FN is lying about the chrome.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    33,984
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Wouldn't the real question be "Is PSA better or worse than a FN rifle?"
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,075
    Feedback Score
    0
    Not all that familiar with FN's barrels. Is the double chrome lining standard for all FN barrels or was this a special run for PSA?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    9,564
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    Wouldn't the real question be "Is PSA better or worse than a FN rifle?"
    Nah, I think the real question is "Can one get that barrel without all the other shit at a PSA discount price?"
    Gettin' down innagrass.
    Let's Go Brandon!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    2,193
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slater View Post
    Not all that familiar with FN's barrels. Is the double chrome lining standard for all FN barrels or was this a special run for PSA?
    For that barrel everything seems right. 'Machine gun steel / double chrome lined'

    I got one of those uppers back in the day for cheap. The barrel is obviously good to go - The other PSA crap they used 'not so much'.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,075
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by titsonritz View Post
    Nah, I think the real question is "Can one get that barrel without all the other shit at a PSA discount price?"
    You can get kind of a basic upper, but I'm not sure if that's a decent price or not:

    https://palmettostatearmory.com/psa-...no-bcg-ch.html

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    9,564
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Slater View Post
    You can get kind of a basic upper, but I'm not sure if that's a decent price or not:

    https://palmettostatearmory.com/psa-...no-bcg-ch.html
    Barrel and FSB only or no thanks.
    Gettin' down innagrass.
    Let's Go Brandon!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    1,777
    Feedback Score
    0
    Standard M16/M4 barrels have a specified chromium plating thickness of 0.0004" minimum. (No maximum given, but historically M16A1s had an upper limit of 0.0015")

    The FN machine guns, M240 and M249, have specified barrel bore chromium plating thickness of: the M249 = 0.0003" to .0009"; the M240 = 0.0006" to 0.0010".

    IF they were plating to twice the thickness of standard M16/M4 barrel that would be a plate thickness of 0.0008" to 0.0030". I will believe that you can plate up to 0.0015". maybe 0.0020" and still meet the uniformity requirements, but not much more than that.

    I say they are quoting their MAXIMUM thickness to the standard MINIMUM thickness, when really they are all about the same, somewhere around 1/2 thousandth of an inch thick.

    (or, show me a cross sectioned barrel with 0.0030" thick plating.)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •