FBI Agents Raiding Mar-a-Lago

[ABNAK]

I've been saying that they are trying to get factions of the people to take up arms against this communist government. So they can can make an example of them for all to see. Write it down for the history books as domestic terrorism. Then use it to disarm the people.

The media is standing by with the pre-written narrative in hand.

That is a risky gamble on their behalf. It could go sideways for them rather quickly and become uncontrollable. It wouldn't have to be a total "revolutionary" success, just get out of control, unable to have a long-lasting lid placed on it. Yeah, we always here "No one's gonna do jack shit" or "People will just roll over and take it, there'll be no Molon Labe". Could be quite true.....but if .gov is wrong about that it would be an epic mistake, definitely one for the history books as you said.

Think about one crackpot like Dorner out in Kali a few years back. One guy turned a shitload upside down, and there wasn't an orchestrated effort to provoke him like this would be.

[Diamondback]

That is a risky gamble on their behalf. It could go sideways for them rather quickly and become uncontrollable. It wouldn't have to be a total "revolutionary" success, just get out of control, unable to have a long-lasting lid placed on it. Yeah, we always here "No one's gonna do jack shit" or "People will just roll over and take it, there'll be no Molon Labe". Could be quite true.....but if .gov is wrong about that it would be an epic mistake, definitely one for the history books as you said.

Think about one crackpot like Dorner out in Kali a few years back. One guy turned a shitload upside down, and there wasn't an orchestrated effort to provoke him like this would be.

All it took was one fanatical nutbar to light off WWI...

[C-grunt]

I got an email from The Epoch Times with an article headline that 14 FBI whistleblowers have contacted Congress. It's a paid website that I dont have a subscription to. Anyone seen this? Is it legit or a gotcha headline?

[HKGuns]

I got an email from The Epoch Times with an article headline that 14 FBI whistleblowers have contacted Congress. It's a paid website that I dont have a subscription to. Anyone seen this? Is it legit or a gotcha headline?

This is likely what you reference.

https://americanews.news/whistleblow...ata-21355.html

It appears real but not real surprising.

https://republicans-judiciary.house....tremists32.pdf

[Diamondback]

You grossly underestimate the middle of the roads crowd and the importance they put on things like "don't be a nazi", "gay rights are more important than all human rights" and "only women are allowed to decide abortion issues because it's their body." And they will defend their misguided notions to the end of their days even if their voting patterns result in gas being $8 a gallon because gas prices are just a carry over from Trump being president anyway.

If they understood "infringement" in the same context they defend abortion rights everyone here would have a non regulated select fire carbine and a suppressor they purchased at Wal Mart.

And sadly, this very thing appears to be an irreconcilable difference that may end ten years with my gal... the extent of her vision is "MUH RIGHT TO CHOOSE!" not caring that there are not one but TWO Pandora's Boxes in play and that our Federal Gov cannot just edict things the way her Turd-on-the-Throne can up there.
1, general: History shows that when a culture deems one group of lives to not have value, no matter what that group may be, invariably subsequent groups are also designated Unworthy Of Life and mass extermination ensues. I read Shirer as a kid, before puberty had lost more lunches over Aktion T4 and similar than most will in an entire lifetime, and too many op-eds from Leftist intelligentsia like the WEF saying things like "with technology we don't really need all these proles consuming all the natural resources and can cull the Useless Eaters" that read uncannily similar to the propaganda of Goebbels about "disposing of the Untermenschen."
2, US specific: Lack of Constitutional authority for FedGov one way or the other means it's a State matter. Earl Warren usurped authority that was not his to wield and gave a "right" that was not his to give, and history shows that once a regime or branch of gov goes autocrat and refuses to abide by limits of power, just as with the Wilsons usurpation uncorrected is further usurpation encouraged, until somebody gives those grabby hands what The Director got in John Wick: Parabellum.

[FromMyColdDeadHand]

Is this already dying down? Was this all to cover over that LIz Cheney was going to lose? Just get some headlines, rile up some crazies, make it seem like Trump is that much closer to being jailed and then; nothing????

[glocktogo]

Is this already dying down? Was this all to cover over that LIz Cheney was going to lose? Just get some headlines, rile up some crazies, make it seem like Trump is that much closer to being jailed and then; nothing????

The hearing before the warrant issuing judge, on whether to unseal the warrant affidavit is tomorrow. Trump wants it unsealed and of course DoJ/FBI don't. Frankly, the issuing judge would be nuts to unseal the affidavit. I have almost zero doubt it will be as vague and misleading as the actual warrant issued. If Judge Reinhart weren't compromised, there'd be no reason for DoJ to seek him out to sign the warrant. I very much doubt the affidavit would even reach constitutional muster for any judge to sign it, much less sign it against a former POTUS.

Personally I hope this is the straw that finally breaks DoJ & FBI's backs. At least at the national level, they're fully compromised and corrupt.

P.S. If you're confused, let me help make it even more confusing. Here's a Yahoo article saying that unsealing the affidavit would be bad for Trump, but that's coming from WaPo, which has filed a FOIA request to unseal the affidavit, and they quote a "former senior official with the Justice Department" saying it would be bad for Trump. An openly hostile media outlet, citing another openly hostile media outlet, citing an anonymous "former" DoJ source in advocacy "for" Trump is absolutely laughable.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-all...163342655.html

[Diamondback]

The hearing before the warrant issuing judge, on whether to unseal the warrant affidavit is tomorrow. Trump wants it unsealed and of course DoJ/FBI don't. Frankly, the issuing judge would be nuts to unseal the affidavit. I have almost zero doubt it will be as vague and misleading as the actual warrant issued. If Judge Reinhart weren't compromised, there'd be no reason for DoJ to seek him out to sign the warrant. I very much doubt the affidavit would even reach constitutional muster for any judge to sign it, much less sign it against a former POTUS.

Personally I hope this is the straw that finally breaks DoJ & FBI's backs. At least at the national level, they're fully compromised and corrupt.

P.S. If you're confused, let me help make it even more confusing. Here's a Yahoo article saying that unsealing the affidavit would be bad for Trump, but that's coming from WaPo, which has filed a FOIA request to unseal the affidavit, and they quote a "former senior official with the Justice Department" saying it would be bad for Trump. An openly hostile media outlet, citing another openly hostile media outlet, citing an anonymous "former" DoJ source in advocacy "for" Trump is absolutely laughable.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-all...163342655.html

This judge also has a conflict of interest from anti-Trump bias and had no business signing the warrant, as illustrated by his own admission when he recused himself from a Trump v Hillary lawsuit... otoh he has no sense of ethics either, again illustrated by his own hand when he resigned from being one of the prosecutors on the Epstein case to become one of Pedo Freak's attorneys.

This man has no sense of ethics and should be disbarred.

[Todd.K]

This judge also has a conflict of interest from anti-Trump bias and had no business signing the warrant, as illustrated by his own admission when he recused himself from a Trump v Hillary lawsuit...

To be fair it’s entirely possible that he partnered with a Clinton lawyer to represent Epstein’s people.

[FromMyColdDeadHand]

https://www.realclearinvestigations....ax_848582.html

The unit behind the raid is the same one that went after Trump-Russia, and is the focus of the Durham “slow-vestigation”. I’ve said than1/6 is all about discrediting The Durham investigation- ie, Trump ran a coup and the FBI/CIA/TLAs ran one against Trump, so we are even. I think they are using this unit this way to make it so that the Durham report looks like a reprisal hit against them..