|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Site Sponsor
Why? Tax dollars will pay for replacements. Not like they are the only pair he's getting.Originally Posted by glocktogo
Not directed to you specifically, and I understand the frustration of the country being led (supposedly) by a feeble old man, but focusing on these sorts of things is childish, petty, makes those who do it look bad and most importantly takes focus away from the GLARING failures he is responsible for.
It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
Chuck, we miss ya man.
كافر
Senior Member
Why would tax dollars pay for his fancy sunglasses?
Regardless, this man has personally caused me a tremendous amount of stress and grief. Not to mention how much money he has also personally cost me. So if something makes him suffer even a fraction of what he’s made me suffer, I want him to suffer it!
What if this whole crusade's a charade?
And behind it all there's a price to be paid
For the blood which we dine
Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…
Site Sponsor
Because every nickel that comes into his hands comes from tax dollars one way or another.
Also so we are clear, people have died because of this shithead and his half assed policies. I have nothing good to say about him.
It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
Chuck, we miss ya man.
كافر
Senior Member
This is no big deal but he is, and always has been, a disgusting excuse for a man and a worse politician. If he wasn't outright lying, he was switching his talking points to match whatever most democrats were thought to be voting for. He's never taken a stand on anything in particular, been wrong on nearly every issue in his career and on the rare occasions he managed to be correct before, he's bent over backwards lately to distance himself from those "errors."
Dem voters can be just comically loyal to some simply awful candidates but even they had to know this was a historically, monumentally poor choice. A group that managed to find a running mate that was, unbelievablely, less likeable than Hillary. And we're all supposed to believe that more people voted for this stiff than did for Obama? C'mon man...
"Why "zombies"? Because calling it 'training to stop a rioting, starving, panicking, desperate mob after a complete governmental financial collapse apocalypse' is just too wordy." or in light of current events: training to stop a rioting, looting, molotov cocktail throwing, skinny jeans wearing, uneducated bunch of lemmings duped by, or working directly for, a marxist organization attempting to tear down America while hiding behind a race-based name
Member
Ngl, i've struggled with a jacket on a few occasions...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks