Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Ever Take The Myers-Briggs Test? 🤔

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    21,898
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)

    Ever Take The Myers-Briggs Test? 🤔

    This is a short version. The full version is quite long. I took the full version in Personality Psych course back in the day, among various psych courses I took. Unlike many/most online personality tests that are nonsense, The Myers-Briggs test is used in all sorts of places, and has been very influential, but not viewed as valid or useful as it once was apparently since I took it mid 90s. Mine, which comes as no surprise:

    Your personality type is:

    Logician
    INTP-T

    " Logicians pride themselves on their unique perspectives and vigorous intellect. They can’t help but puzzle over the mysteries of the universe – which may explain why some of the most influential philosophers and scientists of all time have been Logicians. This personality type is fairly rare, but with their creativity and inventiveness, Logicians aren’t afraid to stand out from the crowd."

    No surprise, ALBERT EINSTEIN was a Logician. What are you?

    https://freshsaga.com/my-purpose/free-mbti-test/
    Last edited by WillBrink; 08-15-22 at 12:02.
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com

    LE/Mil specific info:

    https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/

    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Bora Bora
    Posts
    6,091
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Pretty much everyone in the US Armed Services took that.......or at least they used to........

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    21,898
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by HKGuns View Post
    Pretty much everyone in the US Armed Services took that.......or at least they used to........
    Unlike your usual random untested stuff, that one is heavily researched, time tested, used all over the world, and very accurate.
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com

    LE/Mil specific info:

    https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/

    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Posts
    6,951
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)
    I am also a logistician, ISTJ-A.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,202
    Feedback Score
    53 (100%)
    Logistician. ISTJ-A.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    983
    Feedback Score
    0
    I've found Myers Briggs does a poor job with repeatable results, providing useful insight, predicting motivations, and predicting behavior. It seems to still have wide use in corporate circles, but I wouldn't take that as a measure of accuracy or success.

    The only personality test that's stood up well to scrutiny over time, about 40 years now, is the Five Factor Personality Analysis (Big Five). I recommend using that instead.

    If you want a cliffs notes test that doesn't require as much study, Hartman's People Code does a very good job of accurately predicting motivations and behaviors with less resolution, but also less time invested.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    1,672
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by WillBrink View Post
    Unlike your usual random untested stuff, that one is heavily researched, time tested, used all over the world, and very accurate.
    Not really. MBTI is largely despised by the research/academic community as pseudoscience, and studies have shown that folks can get different results when retaking the test at different times. It was created by people with no formal education in psychology nor educational testing, and was always a product to be sold to the business world.

    The Big Five personality traits model, which has some overlap with some of the things that MBTI score for, typically has much more credence in the scientific community.
    Last edited by Defaultmp3; 08-15-22 at 11:43.
    Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

    老僧三十年前未參禪時、見山是山、見水是水、及至後夾親見知識、有箇入處、見山不是山、見水不是水、而今得箇體歇處、依然見山秪是山、見水秪是水。

    https://www.instagram.com/defaultmp3/

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    21,898
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Defaultmp3 View Post
    Not really. MBTI is largely despised by the research/academic community as pseudoscience, and studies have shown that folks can get different results when retaking the test at different times. It was created by people with no formal education in psychology nor educational testing, and was always a product to be sold to the business world.

    The Big Five personality traits model, which has some overlap with some of the things that MBTI score for, typically has much more credence in the scientific community.
    I edited the OP:

    It's been decades since I took it, so perhaps the modern POV is as you say among modern academics now. It was standard in several psych courses I took, one by personality psych proff at Harvard who was tops in her field at the time, mid 90s. We took that one, the MMI, and others. She didn't put a lot of stock in any of them as I recall, didn't single out MBTI as useless either. Does not surprise better has been developed. A little digging I found this article that's supportive of your comments, it's fallen out of favor:

    https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/b...-fad-won-t-die
    Last edited by WillBrink; 08-15-22 at 12:03.
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com

    LE/Mil specific info:

    https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/

    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    4,128
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    ESTJ here.. and the description pretty much fits me to a T. I do realize it's pretty much junk science though.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,447
    Feedback Score
    0
    Logician
    INTP-A

    I’m very extroverted in that I can and usually can engage strangers in conversation. I’d love to be a talk show interviewer- i get to meet and interact with people and learn new things- but then they go away. I don’t make ‘friends’ easily.

    These self reported tests are interesting. One filled out by other people about you are more interesting.

    Self delusion is very powerful.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •