Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 53

Thread: Best 556 Powder?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,943
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by turnburglar View Post
    @Markm: I didn't know H335 was so flashy. All my guns have proper flash hiders so the limited desert shooting I do at night I didn't notice much. If I switch to a different powder and get a lower flash signature that is a benefit.
    I did a test years back with an 11.5 barrel that had the A2 flash hider. I shot W748 against H335, and it was night and day so to speak. The 748 load was actually hotter velocity wise, but gave no flash. H335 was super flash.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    UT
    Posts
    443
    Feedback Score
    0
    Another TAC vote here as I shoot mostly heavy bullets and it meters so easy on the dillon 550. I have used cfe223 but found it more finicky in load development and extremely dirty for carbon fouling.
    Last edited by B52U; 08-24-22 at 13:15.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    13
    Feedback Score
    0

    Best 556 Powder?

    I like AR Comp, CFE223 and Varget.
    I’ve used all 3 out to 600 with 77 SMK.
    Also the AR Comp performed very well with 62 FMJBT.
    All of 77 SMK are under 1 MOA if I do my part.
    20” Heavy Wilson Combat barrel.

    1 in 8 twist
    All was in 2,700 FPS range.
    AR Comp only varied in 7 FPS in 10 rounds on chronograph.
    Others were in 20 FPS range.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Last edited by Deerhunter_28; 08-24-22 at 17:43.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,943
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by gunnerblue View Post
    8208 XBR is an exceptional powder for heavier bullet weights and my go-to for 77 and 80 grain bullets. If you can find any, stock up.
    It falls in that high "ullage" category referenced in the Primer/bullet movement study by the Army Research Lab.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2022
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    71
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by gunnerblue View Post
    Out of those three, TAC. I use it with everything from 55-77 grain loads and it performs well across the board. Practically speaking, it meters very well in progressives and is available at the moment while being relatively cheap.
    This. TAC is also great in .308. XBR is also a great powder for covering 50-77gr as has already been posted, and meters very well for a stick powder.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Pa
    Posts
    76
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by MegademiC View Post
    I use H322 and like it so far
    This and, or 8208XR.

    Added benefit of both powders being temperature stable and meter well!

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Great lakes
    Posts
    739
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I will be the weird one and suggest N540. Only powder that I have ever used where my measured velocities agreed with published data. Rifle used was 20" Colt A4. N540 from this rifle produced best precision with increasing velocity. 69gr Nosler was the projectile.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,943
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Krazykarl View Post
    I will be the weird one and suggest N540. Only powder that I have ever used where my measured velocities agreed with published data. Rifle used was 20" Colt A4. N540 from this rifle produced best precision with increasing velocity. 69gr Nosler was the projectile.
    I've never tried the Vitavouri line. I was afraid I'd like it too much.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    3,485
    Feedback Score
    58 (100%)
    Truth. I used n320 for 9mm range load.
    Crazy consistent, burned clean enough the glass on optic never got “smoked” like a lot of powders.
    Fortunately it became unavailable for months and I moved on. Twice the amount of my current powder for same price.
    Very good stuff though.
    A true "Gun Guy" (or gal) should have familiarity and a modicum of proficiency with most all firearms platforms.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Inland Northwest
    Posts
    1,356
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    QUOTE=Krazykarl;3057985]I will be the weird one and suggest N540. Only powder that I have ever used where my measured velocities agreed with published data. Rifle used was 20" Colt A4. N540 from this rifle produced best precision with increasing velocity. 69gr Nosler was the projectile.[/QUOTE]

    Some manufacturers publish data gleaned from test barrels and universal receivers. Hornady used to (and may still) list the specific firearm used to gather velocity

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •