Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 357

Thread: ATF is going to have an amnesty for braced pistols

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    3,866
    Feedback Score
    0

    ATF is going to have an amnesty for braced pistols

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nt2aZ1HTaRE

    This is going to get very interesting. Obviously stating in writing that something's legal and then changing the regulations with no corresponding change in the law is complete and utter BS. Add to this a point system that they fabricated out of nothing and the number of firearms involved. I'm expecting to see lawsuits.

    They'll require a before picture, so if you had the thought of avoiding the $200 for a pistol that was never braced, that's not going to happen.
    Last edited by Bret; 01-10-24 at 13:46.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3,952
    Feedback Score
    0
    I think the ATF has ZERO chance of getting away with this in light of recent court rulings.

    So I am not worried.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    9,930
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    #ThirdHole soon?
    What if this whole crusade's a charade?
    And behind it all there's a price to be paid
    For the blood which we dine
    Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    3,866
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by glocktogo View Post
    #ThirdHole soon?
    I was hoping that it would just be a general amnesty, but no such luck.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.E. OH
    Posts
    7,617
    Feedback Score
    0
    So if I do amnesty, I can put a stock on it and avoid the $200 tax? Basically a braced pistol would become an sbr without the tax, right?
    Last edited by MegademiC; 09-02-22 at 17:38.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    9,930
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MegademiC View Post
    So if I do amnesty, I can put a stock on it and avoid the $200 tax? Basically a braced pistol would become an sbr without the tax, right?
    If we’re reading this right, yes? So basically you could eFile a Form 1 to “amnesty” a pistol braced lower, NOT pay $200, and voilà, free SBR stamp!
    What if this whole crusade's a charade?
    And behind it all there's a price to be paid
    For the blood which we dine
    Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    215
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by yoni View Post
    I think the ATF has ZERO chance of getting away with this in light of recent court rulings.

    So I am not worried.
    And now, still not worried? ATF did it. And like good sheeple, many just obeyed the ATF illegal request to register their already legal firearm and change it's classification.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,420
    Feedback Score
    125 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by GunFighter98 View Post
    This sounds like a ploy to gain more information on gun owners for something later on. I don't trust it.
    Trust them ? You play by *their* rules and at some point they ***will*** change *their* rules to, okay boys turn them in because we know what you got and where you live. These days only easily deceived and manipulated suckers and fools would trust the corrupt SOB’s at the BATF and DOJ.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    WY
    Posts
    1,116
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    There is no way this is a good risk. JMO.

    Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,451
    Feedback Score
    0
    If I do the ‘registration’ of the braced AR, how does that affect if I want to sell/transfer it? After i file the paperwork, can I put a real stock on it>?
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •