I thought the A5 made the length of pull too long, does this no longer apply?
So, while a rifle’s length of pull is normally used to determine how well it will fit an individual shooter, an AR-15 pistol’s length of pull is important because the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (aka ATF) has advised shooters that an AR-15 pistol with a length of pull greater than 13.5 inches may constitute a redesign of the brace into a stock.
“The Trump Doctrine is ‘We’re America, Bitch.’ That’s the Trump Doctrine.”
"He is free to evade reality, he is free to unfocus his mind and stumble blindly down any road he pleases, but not free to avoid the abyss he refuses to see."
It does. In Section III of the 4999. LOP with the brace in the most rearward locked position greater than 13.5” is 4 points. 4 points equals an SBR. SB Tactical does sell plugs to fill the rear most notches on buffer tubes to prevent them from locking at longer than 13.5”.
https://www.atf.gov/file/154866/download
Okay now that I could see them trying to pull. Essentially saying that you're not going to get a free stamp for something they never approved. So in other words there will be no more braced pistols after this period, even the ones they already approved explicitly. They'll just get a free stamp for the misunderstanding I guess...
In the end, I don't think that's going to fly, though, where they can approve some configurations and not others, because according to the definitions laid down by congress they're all the same thing. There's no room in the law to say oh this is a pistol but that's a rifle because it has a magnified optic on it.
The moral of the story though is that we'll just have to configure them however the ATF likes them for the photo shoot, then once you get the free stamp do whatever you want.
Last edited by okie; 09-12-22 at 18:34.
So, if I have a pistol that is over 26 inches, and has an SBA3, where do I stand in all of this? I keep reading and hearing all sorts of conflicting information.
I would think that there are letters from the ATF that allowed 11.5 inch pistol uppers? Otherwise they could just round those people up now?
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
BBL length has nothing to do with it. If the speculation is correct the atf will consider anything over 26" OAL not eligible to use a brace, otherwise it will be considered an SBR. Either remove the brace, or figure out some way to get it under 26" OAL (11.5 with a standard receiver extension is under 26" as was mentioned by Clint). The atf also reserves the right to call anything an SBR if they feel like it (as mentioned in the publication) so the "points" don't mean anything even if you are within the 12-26" OAL and heavier than 64oz "rules", however.
The law hasn't changed, short barrel firearms without stocks are still legal. The atf's "interpretation" of braces is changing (potentially), and depending on what a brace is installed on will determine if the brace is a brace or if the brace is actually a "stock" in their eyes.
"I pity thou, fools who dost not choose BCM" - King Arthur 517 A.D.
.OlllllllO.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
Psalms 109:8, 43:1
LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.
Bookmarks