Last edited by Molon; 09-17-22 at 12:47.
All that is necessary for trolls to flourish, is for good men to do nothing.
Thanks! I found 2 more like it. So, I took all 5 that I had, imported them into Photoshop and layered them all on top of each other. There were no deviations and 100% overlap. Even 2009 is ok as the MK12 Mod1 was still in use then. To Me, it has character. I have an old style Armalite upper with the AR+ forge that I'm going to use in my MK12 Mod 0 build, but that's another topic.... Thanks for the great pic!!!
One question..... Is it normal for the white T-marks to have paint that is not completely dry??? Almost like a gooey with an off-yellowish tinge on the surface and with white paint residue in the crease of the pic rail-lug interface???? It looks almost like someone re-painted the marks and tried to clean up the mess with some of the white smearing over the numbers??? The photo manager won't let me upload any more photos and won't let me delete the ones I have used so I can't show the T-marks. I'll have to learn how to work around the 2.00 MB max size.
Compare the C stamping to the OP's picture. Not only is it shallow but it was done POST anodizing. All of the Colt stamped receivers are PRE anodizing and done by the forging company, Colt does NOT stamp the upper receivers thus the "Colt = non consistent" doesn't apply here anyways.
C in the OP's photo is raised, not stamped, just like the 2nd photo in post #11 Compare both photos, marks are the same.
Last edited by kirkland; 09-18-22 at 12:57.
Bookmarks