Originally Posted by
ryr8828
Just when you think you're on a winning streak,
The Supreme Court declined Monday to consider the latest challenge to a federal ban on bump stocks, keeping in place the prohibition on devices that essentially allow shooters to fire semiautomatic rifles continuously with one pull of the trigger.
https://www.wsiltv.com/news/supreme-...ed851ef87.html
Yes, but no.
From another forum:
The title of the article is a bit misleading as these cases are not really about gun rights, but administrative law and separation of powers.
SCOTUS dropping these petitions is not that surprising because the Fifth Circuit agreed to en banc rehearing of another challenge to the bump fire stock regulation in June. The Court likely decided to wait and see what the Fifth Circuit does with that case (they can always take a petition from that case if they think it is wrongly decided).
That is why they declined it.
"Warriors"
Out of every 100 men, ten shouldn't even be there, eighty are just targets. Nine are the real fighters and we are lucky to have them for they make the battle. Ah, but the one...one is a Warrior, and he will bring all the others back.
-Heraclitis
Bookmarks