Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: Army's first trans officer indicted for spying for Russians

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    A Little Here And A Little There
    Posts
    3,232
    Feedback Score
    82 (100%)
    Twenty years ago this would have been an SNL skit.
    "Once we get some iron in our souls, we'll get some iron in our hands..."

    "...A rapid, aggressive response will let you get away with some pretty audacious things if you are willing to be mean, fast, and naked."-Failure2Stop

    "The Right can meme; the Left can organize. I guess now we know which one is important." - Random internet comment

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,950
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Sounds like the Army needs tolerance training for those loyal to our enemies. I mean.. it's discriminatory to mistreat this freak based on his allegiance.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Urban Cessmaze
    Posts
    4,843
    Feedback Score
    25 (100%)
    "Max Klinger" was a TV character - not an aspirational role model!
    - Either you're part of the problem or you're part of the solution or you're just part of the landscape - Sam (Robert DeNiro) in, "Ronin" -

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,453
    Feedback Score
    0
    This is totally Orwellian: one story, two screens..

    https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/29/polit...rds/index.html

    https://freebeacon.com/national-secu...nfo-to-russia/

    Is it transgendered or not? Not a hint on CNN- I thought it was a different story. Also, did CNN ‘dead-name’ the dude?
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    1,215
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JimP View Post
    Mental illness used to be a disqualifier for the military; now it is lauded. We reap what we sow.
    This.

    The Commies and counter-culture go after the mentally disabled first.
    Todd
    Colt/BCM

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    7,134
    Feedback Score
    26 (100%)
    I'm so confused.

    Born as a male then had its man parts modified to be a female, then married a female.


    Riots are like sports, it's better to watch it on TV at home.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,320
    Feedback Score
    9 (91%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam View Post
    I'm so confused.

    Born as a male then had its man parts modified to be a female, then married a female.
    Well, he thought he was a lesbian, so…


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    District 11
    Posts
    6,348
    Feedback Score
    24 (100%)
    The hilarious thing is that Russia would have long locked his crazy ass away in an asylum.
    Let those who are fond of blaming and finding fault, while they sit safely at home, ask, ‘Why did you not do thus and so?’I wish they were on this voyage; I well believe that another voyage of a different kind awaits them.”

    Christopher Columbus

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Location
    Southern Maryland
    Posts
    479
    Feedback Score
    0
    Is he/she/it guilty of treason or espionage? One of these is actually punishable by death.
    Last edited by Harpoon; 10-01-22 at 14:08.
    Sic Semper Tyrannis

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,453
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Harpoon View Post
    I he/she/it guilty of treason or espionage? One of these is actually punishable by death.
    Is the difference that the first one is actively participating in a activity to bring down the US government, while the second would be mainly sharing information?
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •