Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: Wilson Purchesed Lehigh Defense

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    21,891
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by T2C View Post
    Handgun rounds are not good for penetrating barriers, then performing as intended. I would like to see Wilson Combat test the LeHigh Defense cartridge while using denim, jacket leather and canvas duck material.
    Done many times, some of which posted here already.

    Quote Originally Posted by T2C View Post
    Eventually, we will see a number of shootings where LeHigh Defense ammunition was used and have the ability to collect real data.
    Some day perhaps, I'd personally like to see formal testing which I suspect will come sooner.
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com

    LE/Mil specific info:

    https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/

    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    21,891
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by yoni View Post
    I would NEVER carry this ammo. Since it is a hollowpoint at those speeds it will over expand and under penetrate.
    Unless it was designed / engineered to perform specifically at those velocities as to penetration and expansion. I do like the barrier blind aspect of the Lehigh.
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com

    LE/Mil specific info:

    https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/

    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    5,998
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by WillBrink View Post
    Done many times, some of which posted here already.



    Some day perhaps, I'd personally like to see formal testing which I suspect will come sooner.
    We were issued a high-speed service pistol cartridge that performed brilliantly during ballistic gelatin testing. It performed poorly in the field. People who worked in our central firearm training facility were big fans of the cartridge. Field personnel who were involved in shooting incidents and criminal investigators were not.

    I'll wait for real world data before making a decision about a defensive pistol cartridge.
    Train 2 Win

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    21,891
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by T2C View Post
    We were issued a high-speed service pistol cartridge that performed brilliantly during ballistic gelatin testing. It performed poorly in the field. People who worked in our central firearm training facility were big fans of the cartridge. Field personnel who were involved in shooting incidents and criminal investigators were not.

    I'll wait for real world data before making a decision about a defensive pistol cartridge.
    Makes sense. We all know the 5.7 story...
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com

    LE/Mil specific info:

    https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/

    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Lowcountry, SC.
    Posts
    6,239
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by WillBrink View Post
    Unless it was designed / engineered to perform specifically at those velocities as to penetration and expansion.
    It isn’t. Its got a gaping maw, is lightweight, and is advertised to reduce penetration.

    “Reduced over-penetration”

    “We designed the Civil Defense line to eliminate threats with one round.”

    “the hydraulic pressure builds until the side walls of the projectile explode. With that explosion comes rifle sized temporary cavities and hydrostatic shock, therefore increasing stopping power by tenfold. Following the explosion, the bullet fragments into a starburst shaped pattern”

    “reduced over penetration and lessening the risk of unintended casualties”
    Last edited by 1168; 10-02-22 at 10:02.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    21,891
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by 1168 View Post
    It isn’t. Its got a gaping maw, is lightweight, and is advertised to reduce penetration.
    Then I would never use it personally. Penetration is more important then expansion if it's a choice between one or the other. Modern JHPs do an excellent balance of both when they perform reliably, as intended. A JHP that expands early due to high velocity but fails to penetrate to hit the important stuff is fail.
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com

    LE/Mil specific info:

    https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/

    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,751
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Remember these arent radically new designs, cavitation bullets have been around for a long time and never really caught on for good reason.

    Forward Ascertainment Group

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3,941
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by T2C View Post
    We were issued a high-speed service pistol cartridge that performed brilliantly during ballistic gelatin testing. It performed poorly in the field. People who worked in our central firearm training facility were big fans of the cartridge. Field personnel who were involved in shooting incidents and criminal investigators were not.

    I'll wait for real world data before making a decision about a defensive pistol cartridge.
    What was the velocity and caliber of the round?

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    5,998
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by yoni View Post
    What was the velocity and caliber of the round?
    115g 9mm +P+. Average Velocity was 1,340 fps out of a 4" barrel. The bodies that I saw had exit wounds the size of entrance wounds. The autopsy photos that I reviewed showed the same results.

    The cartridge was an excellent sub-machine gun round. I never saw autopsy photos of SMG deaths that involved fewer than a dozen hits, so I do not think it was indicative of performance from a handgun.
    Train 2 Win

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,751
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by yoni View Post
    I would NEVER carry this ammo. Since it is a hollowpoint at those speeds it will over expand and under penetrate.
    Well the point Im trying to make is velocity isnt an indicator of capability. There are plenty of low velocity examples that perform fantastically like shotgun slugs, lever action magnums or even musket balls that are traveling at pistol velocities that make both massive temp. stretch cavities and perm. crush cavities in gel with excellent real world results.

    These days I just go right past the marketing gimmicks of velocity and energy, for me it just comes down to what is the interaction between the bullet and tissue with or without intervening barriers.
    Last edited by vicious_cb; 10-02-22 at 22:21.
    Forward Ascertainment Group

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •