BOLO - 600’ Russian nuclear sub with “doomsday weapon” missing

[Lacos]

Doomsday weapon on this sub can create 1600’ radioactive tsunami once its perfected.
The hunt for “Red October” coming to the coast near you.

“NATO has reportedly warned members that Russia's Belgorod submarine no longer appeared to be operating out of its White Sea base, where it has been active since July. Officials warned that Russia may plan to test Belgorod's "Poseidon" weapons system, a drone equipped with a nuclear bomb that Russia has claimed is capable of creating a "radioactive tsunami," according to Italian media.

The drone can be deployed from the submarine at any time and detonated at a depth of 1 kilometer near a coastal city. Russian state media has claimed the device can create a 1,600-ft. wave that smashes into the coast and irradiates it.”


https://www.foxnews.com/world/russia...-harbor-report

[tn1911]

It ain’t missing, the traffic jam of US and UK attack subs trailing this thing must be epic!

[Harpoon]

It's not missing.

[glocktogo]

It ain’t missing, the traffic jam of US and UK attack subs trailing this thing must be epic!

Question is, will they know to shoot it BEFORE it launches a weapon? And if they do shoot it, will that provoke Putin to retaliate with another nuke?

[Allen]

Officials warned that Russia may plan to test Belgorod's "Poseidon" weapons system, a drone equipped with a nuclear bomb that Russia has claimed is capable of creating a "radioactive tsunami," according to Italian media.

The drone can be deployed from the submarine at any time and detonated at a depth of 1 kilometer near a coastal city. Russian state media has claimed the device can create a 1,600-ft. wave that smashes into the coast and irradiates it.”

So a MK48 with a nuke?

Glad to see their engineers and the click bait mill caught up to the Clancy books I was reading in the '90's.

[HKGuns]

It's not missing.

Pretty much this exactly.

[Harpoon]

As for this doomsday crap, it's old news.
We tested water nukes effects on captured and other warships after WWII.
Water nuke pops are very bad news for the ships in that area, who knew?

[HKGuns]

As for this doomsday crap, it's old news.
We tested water nukes effects on captured and other warships after WWII.
Water nuke pops are very bad news for the ships in that area, who knew?

The fishies too. This is just more poorly or zero researched fake news from the purveyors of propaganda.

[gsd2053]

[FromMyColdDeadHand]

As for this doomsday crap, it's old news.
We tested water nukes effects on captured and other warships after WWII.
Water nuke pops are very bad news for the ships in that area, who knew?

Actually, I thought a lot of the ships that they did testing on after World War II did fairly well? As in it’s much harder to sink ships with a nuclear bomb than you think.

As to a nuclear wave coming ashore, I don’t think it works like that. A wave sends energy, moving, not the water itself so the water near the bomb does move, but then moves the water next to it, which moves the water next to it it’s not the water near the bomb, that would impact the shore. With all that water around, I’m not sure exactly what the radio logical effects would be. You always have the material the bomb, but I thought it was the radiation of other materials that lead to the large amount of fall out, so if you have all that water tamping the radiation, I’m not sure what kind of “waterfallout” you’d get. Of course some thing close to the bottom would be different.