Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 90

Thread: Oregon Prop 114

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    174
    Feedback Score
    0

    Oregon Prop 114

    Well Oregon… you’ve outdone yourselves… this steaming pile of unconstitutional legislation just might pass…
    https://stop114.com/
    EATADIK.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    794
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by eric0311 View Post
    Well Oregon… you’ve outdone yourselves… this steaming pile of unconstitutional legislation just might pass…
    https://stop114.com/
    In FL, Certified Police Firearms Instructor can teach the FL CCW Course as a side business on their off hours. Many do it and make a pile of money from it. It is one of the reasons why Constitutional Carry is opposed by FL LE.

    Does Prop 114 mandate that it must be the agency that trains people, or simply a certified police instructor? Because if it is just saying that it must be a Certified Police Firearms Instructor, then watch them make off-duty details and side businesses and rolling in the money.
    ¡Cuba Libre!
    ¡Patria y Vida!


    "Socialist ideology, like so many others, has two main dangers. One stems from confused and incomplete readings of foreign texts, and the other from the arrogance and hidden rage of those who, in order to climb up in the world, pretend to be frantic defenders of the helpless so as to have shoulders on which to stand." - José Martí - Cuban Statesman & Patriot
    I'm an American Patriot and a Cuban Refugee - Miami JBT
    FL STATE DIRECTOR FOR GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    174
    Feedback Score
    0
    It looks like an LE approved/certified trainer will only be allowed to facilitate the training for permit to purchase a firearm.
    EATADIK.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    794
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by eric0311 View Post
    It looks like an LE approved/certified trainer will only be allowed to facilitate the training for permit to purchase a firearm.
    That still doesn't answer my question, does Prop 114 prevent a certified law enforcement officer from building a side hustle to certify folks?

    Because if it does, then you'll see less resistance from LE in opposing Prop 114.
    ¡Cuba Libre!
    ¡Patria y Vida!


    "Socialist ideology, like so many others, has two main dangers. One stems from confused and incomplete readings of foreign texts, and the other from the arrogance and hidden rage of those who, in order to climb up in the world, pretend to be frantic defenders of the helpless so as to have shoulders on which to stand." - José Martí - Cuban Statesman & Patriot
    I'm an American Patriot and a Cuban Refugee - Miami JBT
    FL STATE DIRECTOR FOR GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    174
    Feedback Score
    0
    My bad… I do not know the answer to that question … I’m tracking and completely agree… if there is an incentive to make money off civilians in a “permit scheme”, LE is gonna follow the cash.
    EATADIK.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    2,767
    Feedback Score
    0
    As I understand it the training must occur at a 'State approved" training facility of which there are very few. I heard many counties have no such facility. I don't expect the list is expected to grow either.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    WY
    Posts
    1,116
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by utahjeepr View Post
    As I understand it the training must occur at a 'State approved" training facility of which there are very few. I heard many counties have no such facility. I don't expect the list is expected to grow either.
    Yeah this is designed to make it difficult and discourage carry. I'm so glad I left the west coast.

    Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    4,634
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by eric0311 View Post
    this steaming pile of unconstitutional legislation just might pass…
    https://stop114.com/
    The fact that it might NOT pass is a far bigger takeaway.

    Massive money behind it, deceptively “reasonable” title for non gun people, in a very blue state, and it may just barely make it.

    I mean, we STILL have a mask mandate for healthcare facilities, with no real pushback here.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    9,564
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    My kids are down in Albany and approve of their Sheriff saying Nope to the mag BS. I'll be voting with my feet soon enough.

    Linn County Sheriff's Office 'is NOT going to be enforcing magazine capacity limits'

    https://www.facebook.com/LinnSheriff/
    Gettin' down innagrass.
    Let's Go Brandon!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    149
    Feedback Score
    0
    I just dropped some coin on more OEM Glock mags for a future planned build but this thing is such garbage I’m not even sure it was worth it. This bill has so many issues it isn’t even funny. I hope GOA jumps on this. A buddy just decided at get an AR10 lower and his number on the State background check was over 10k. Dems remain the greatest gun salesman ever.

Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •