Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 90

Thread: Oregon Prop 114

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    33,884
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    One more reason to never visit Oregon.

    Looking at a reciprocity map, looks like we've lost Washington state too, up until 2013 Washington state used to have reciprocity with Florida. That's a shame, I used to visit the resting place of Bruce Lee from time to time and Seattle was a nice stop over day rest when I flew to Alaska.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    149
    Feedback Score
    0
    The dumbest thing is standard mags are grandfathered but you can’t use them in a CCW situation. My BIL doesn’t even own a pistol magazine that holds less than 11 rounds.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    794
    Feedback Score
    0
    This won't fly post Bruen
    ¡Cuba Libre!
    ¡Patria y Vida!


    "Socialist ideology, like so many others, has two main dangers. One stems from confused and incomplete readings of foreign texts, and the other from the arrogance and hidden rage of those who, in order to climb up in the world, pretend to be frantic defenders of the helpless so as to have shoulders on which to stand." - José Martí - Cuban Statesman & Patriot
    I'm an American Patriot and a Cuban Refugee - Miami JBT
    FL STATE DIRECTOR FOR GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    4,630
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    It probably won’t hold up well in court. But that will take years and tons of money.

    Quote Originally Posted by sndt1319 View Post
    I just dropped some coin on more OEM Glock mags for a future planned build...
    As a range toy it’s fine for now. Carry or even HD looks like a no go with regular mags to me, a creative new front from the gun grabbers.

    One BIG problem a lot of people don’t know about, Glock ban mags have a long standing reputation of being less reliable. Especially with HP. Glock is a poor choice for use in a ban State.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    794
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd.K View Post
    It probably won’t hold up well in court. But that will take years and tons of money.



    As a range toy it’s fine for now. Carry or even HD looks like a no go with regular mags to me, a creative new front from the gun grabbers.

    One BIG problem a lot of people don’t know about, Glock ban mags have a long standing reputation of being less reliable. Especially with HP. Glock is a poor choice for use in a ban State.
    That won't fly under vagueness
    ¡Cuba Libre!
    ¡Patria y Vida!


    "Socialist ideology, like so many others, has two main dangers. One stems from confused and incomplete readings of foreign texts, and the other from the arrogance and hidden rage of those who, in order to climb up in the world, pretend to be frantic defenders of the helpless so as to have shoulders on which to stand." - José Martí - Cuban Statesman & Patriot
    I'm an American Patriot and a Cuban Refugee - Miami JBT
    FL STATE DIRECTOR FOR GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    149
    Feedback Score
    0
    Toddk,

    Thanks for the heads up. I’ve got options for carry outside the Glock. I mainly keep my permit up to date for when I travel with my stuff. The way this law was written makes it less helpful now that mags are practically treated like a firearm for storage purposes.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,382
    Feedback Score
    0
    What is this no hicaps for CCW and HD? Are they trying to get around the issue of a 'taking' by outlawing mags by saying that you can have them, you just can't use them?
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    149
    Feedback Score
    0
    You can only use them on your property or at an approved location like a range. There is no provision for the general use of CCW. I’d think for HD you would be good to go.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    33,884
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by sndt1319 View Post
    You can only use them on your property or at an approved location like a range. There is no provision for the general use of CCW. I’d think for HD you would be good to go.
    For now. Then after a period of time it will be "high caps" aren't legal doncha know.

    I still remember when seat belt laws were first mandated, but with the assurance it wouldn't be used for justification for a stop. After a time that changed and the example became a template for all enforcement.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    149
    Feedback Score
    0
    Oh I’m under no illusions that this is over. I’m just planning on letting the courts do their thing. Oregon needs to get put in their place by SCOTUS. This place is getting out of control. But leaving doesn’t help, we need to stay and keep voting for liberty.

Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •