Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Increasing the thickness of a loose Radian barrel nut?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    28
    Feedback Score
    0

    Increasing the thickness of a loose Radian barrel nut?

    I recently purchased a Model 1 build kit and I’m really impressed with the quality of the parts. I do have an issue with the rail and barrel nut though.

    In the build instructions, it says: “The rail is designed to have a tight fight with the barrel nut. Moderate force might be needed to slide the rail over the barrel nut.” Unfortunately, the fit between my barrel nut and rail is very loose. The barrel nut slides easily in an out of the rail with little to no resistance.

    Here is a video of the loose fit: https://imgur.com/a/4K7PD24

    I contacted Radian about this and the rep I spoke with was nice enough but he didn’t really seem to be concerned about my problem and told me the rail will lock up just fine. I want to trust him but everything I could find online about this says that there should be a very tight fit between the rail and the barrel nut.

    This Reddit thread shows how tight the fit should be: https://www.reddit.com/r/RadianWeapons/comments/y8jlot/how_in_gods_name_do_i_remove_the_handguard_on_a/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf

    Since Radian didn’t really seem concerned with my issue, I either have to ignore it and hope for the best or I need to find some way to tighten up the fit between the barrel nut and the rail.

    My best idea at the moment is the spray the outside of the barrel nut with a few coats of Alumahyde II. This should add a little bit of thickness to tighten up the fit between the rail and barrel nut.

    Any thoughts? Am I just being an OCD nutcase?
    Last edited by Leicafan1990; 11-30-22 at 00:37. Reason: Link issue

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,102
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Why do you feel it necessary for the barrel nut to be a press fit into the handguard? I see that it slides on easily, but is there wobble?
    “You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our heart is restless until it rests in you.” -Augustine

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    28
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by georgeib View Post
    Why do you feel it necessary for the barrel nut to be a press fit into the handguard? I see that it slides on easily, but is there wobble?
    Yes, the barrel nut has is a small amount of wobble once it’s slid all the way in to the rail.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,917
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    I'm not familiar with radian. Is there some kind of fastener that will tighten up the handguard and remove the play??
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,412
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    I’d get back on the phone with radian and ask if you can buy a larger barrel nut or even batter exchange it.

    Everything machined has a tolerance range. Probably +/- .005 that means through stacking tolerances your barrel nut and rail could have a difference in size of .019” and still be “in spec”. Ideally I think you want a rail about .001 larger than the nut.

    I recently bought a Geissele ‘blem’ upper and rail with the tab. They state everything is “in spec” and only cosmetic blem. We’ll I’ll tell you what, if it’s “inspec” it’s at the absolute outer limits of that spec. The upper rattles around when put on lowers and the rail to barrel nut is also super loose. I have other Geissele rails and the rail to but meet up is not more than a .001 gap.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    2,692
    Feedback Score
    40 (100%)
    I think press fits are a PIA. I would mock it up on a upper reciver and tighten down the rail to the barrel nut and evaluate from there.
    nawai

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    4,652
    Feedback Score
    11 (92%)
    What ^^ He ^^ said

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,917
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by TMS951 View Post
    Everything machined has a tolerance range. Probably +/- .005 that means through stacking tolerances your barrel nut and rail could have a difference in size of .019” and still be “in spec”
    hash tag AMERICAN MEDIOCRITY!
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,412
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by themonk View Post
    I think press fits are a PIA. I would mock it up on a upper reciver and tighten down the rail to the barrel nut and evaluate from there.
    Press fits are a pain in the ass. But they are not what we are talking about here. They are just another way of selling parts of loose tolerances. Everything is just sized tight.

    We’re talking about matching the over diameter of the barrel but to the inside diameter of the rail. We’re taking about a what should be .001” size difference with a +/- .001” tolerance. This is easily achievable by high quality American manufacturing. You need sharp tooling and the right machine speed. That’s it.

    There is an alternative if you want to run production faster and sloppier at the mediocre standard of +/- .005” and thats to hand match nuts to rails. You can honestly send out a perfect match this way, but you lose interchangeability.

    Sounds like the op just got a sloppy fit from a loose tolerance call out. MarkM was correct to call it American mediocrity.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    2,692
    Feedback Score
    40 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by TMS951 View Post
    Press fits are a pain in the ass. But they are not what we are talking about here. They are just another way of selling parts of loose tolerances. Everything is just sized tight.

    We’re talking about matching the over diameter of the barrel but to the inside diameter of the rail. We’re taking about a what should be .001” size difference with a +/- .001” tolerance. This is easily achievable by high quality American manufacturing. You need sharp tooling and the right machine speed. That’s it.

    There is an alternative if you want to run production faster and sloppier at the mediocre standard of +/- .005” and thats to hand match nuts to rails. You can honestly send out a perfect match this way, but you lose interchangeability.

    Sounds like the op just got a sloppy fit from a loose tolerance call out. MarkM was correct to call it American mediocrity.
    I understand exactly what we are talking about. Thanks for the clarification
    nawai

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •