Page 23 of 25 FirstFirst ... 132122232425 LastLast
Results 221 to 230 of 243

Thread: Dept of Justice announces the new rules on Stabilizing Braces.

  1. #221
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,588
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by prepare View Post
    Fix bayonets and get ready to charge.
    That's the SPIRIT!

    Some of you will see what I did there.

  2. #222
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,519
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Has anyone been investigating this new tidbit?

    https://youtu.be/Z223IKjaBbs

  3. #223
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Former USA
    Posts
    3,143
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Inkslinger View Post
    Has anyone been investigating this new tidbit?

    https://youtu.be/Z223IKjaBbs
    What will the compliance nazis do now?
    You won't outvote the corruption.
    Sic Semper Tyrannis

  4. #224
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,446
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Inkslinger View Post
    Has anyone been investigating this new tidbit?

    https://youtu.be/Z223IKjaBbs
    I guess no longer checking it at the airport…
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  5. #225
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    2,767
    Feedback Score
    0
    Nothing like having the state say, "If you did as we said then, you broke the law! Now do what we say today, or you are breaking the law!"

  6. #226
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Southern Kali...
    Posts
    1,119
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    https://youtu.be/iGdjQ4Iylzo

    Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk

  7. #227
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,446
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by utahjeepr View Post
    Nothing like having the state say, "If you did as we said then, you broke the law! Now do what we say today, or you are breaking the law!"
    And how do I think that if you destroy it, they won’t like how you did it, and that will even open you to liability…

    We need to go after all the women that had then legal but now illegal abortions…
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  8. #228
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,519
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Here’s a little more clarification.

    https://www.youtube.com/live/DPCkHpWu3Yo?feature=share

  9. #229
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    N AZ
    Posts
    372
    Feedback Score
    0
    That's the SPIRIT!

    Some of you will see what I did there.

    RIP Rutger. Great scene.
    Last edited by StainlessSteelRat; 01-26-23 at 21:30.

  10. #230
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    37
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    Serious question, trying (and mostly failing, 200+ pages is ridiculous) to understand all of this: Assuming the ATF cannot waive a tax that is established by statute, how is the regulatory banning of the braces, which deprives the owners thereof of all the economic value of the item, not a "taking" which requires compensation by the government? Shouldn't ATF be making plans to compensate all brace owners for the value of the now banned items? Particularly since the manufacturers and owners of the items relied upon the ATF's guidance in the past?

Page 23 of 25 FirstFirst ... 132122232425 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •