Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: B-52 finally gets new engines

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,281
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)

    B-52 finally gets new engines

    We got our money out of those air frames, finally they are getting new engines.

    https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...rgoing-testing

    Now that testing has begun, Rolls-Royce has provided first looks at the F130 turbofan engines in their dual-pod configuration that will replace the outdated TF33 engines currently equipping the U.S. Air Force’s B-52H Stratofortress fleet. Rolls-Royce has offered this imagery as part of an update on the years-long effort to re-engine and modernize the service’s bombers. In fact, the fight to get the B-52 new engines is a saga that dates back decades.
    “The Trump Doctrine is ‘We’re America, Bitch.’ That’s the Trump Doctrine.”

    "He is free to evade reality, he is free to unfocus his mind and stumble blindly down any road he pleases, but not free to avoid the abyss he refuses to see."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,485
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Long overdue, shoulda been done decades ago. Back in college a retired fighter-jock prof and I did a design study on a rewinged, re-engined BUFF powered by four big GE90s with enough power to deadlift itself straight up at gross weight... granted, we wanted to do a total teardown and overhaul to make Dale Brown's "Old Dog" hotrod look like the 1940s prototypes by comparison.
    Last edited by Diamondback; 03-02-23 at 17:43.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,281
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    I don't quite understand why they are sticking with 8 engines but maybe it makes sense from a plumbing/wiring standpoint.
    “The Trump Doctrine is ‘We’re America, Bitch.’ That’s the Trump Doctrine.”

    "He is free to evade reality, he is free to unfocus his mind and stumble blindly down any road he pleases, but not free to avoid the abyss he refuses to see."

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,485
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Redundancy, it's harder to knock out eight small engines than four big ones.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    257
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mack7.62 View Post
    I don't quite understand why they are sticking with 8 engines but maybe it makes sense from a plumbing/wiring standpoint.
    I’ve read somewhere that going to 4 would be an issue cause everything is wired and built for 8 and it would be an electrical nightmare to make everything work.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    154
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacific5th View Post
    I’ve read somewhere that going to 4 would be an issue cause everything is wired and built for 8 and it would be an electrical nightmare to make everything work.
    Exactly, wiring, structure is all designed for eight. Then they added the heavy storage beam adapters(underwing pylons) to carry smart bombs and even more electrical.

    Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    61
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post
    Redundancy, it's harder to knock out eight small engines than four big ones.
    Just wondering, if anybody knows: how many engines - or what combination of engines - can keep one of these in the air?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    15,436
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruark View Post
    Just wondering, if anybody knows: how many engines - or what combination of engines - can keep one of these in the air?
    I've heard once you're at altitude one alone will do.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,281
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruark View Post
    Just wondering, if anybody knows: how many engines - or what combination of engines - can keep one of these in the air?
    I think that will depend on before or after weapons drop and fuel burn off plus while they did a lot of high altitude work during the GWOT as part of the nuclear triad they will do low level penetrations.
    Last edited by mack7.62; 03-03-23 at 22:00.
    “The Trump Doctrine is ‘We’re America, Bitch.’ That’s the Trump Doctrine.”

    "He is free to evade reality, he is free to unfocus his mind and stumble blindly down any road he pleases, but not free to avoid the abyss he refuses to see."

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma City
    Posts
    4,665
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    The Buff has already outlived it's designers and very likely a lot or most of the original A model crews.

    It'll probably outlive all the D model crews that served over Vietnam.

    The H model will probably outlive the crews that sat with them on SAC alert during the Cold War.

    Sometimes you get a design right from the start and don't screw with it except to upgrade engines, electronics, etc. Kinda like the A-10 and F-15...
    Experience is a cruel teacher, gives the exam first and then the lesson.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •