Originally Posted by
WillBrink
I can't confirm accuracy, but that makes sense under my comments from above. On another forum, someone said:
"So the issue here is the US Capital is a separate branch of government.
The US DOJ is the executive branch so they didn’t have “possession” of the video.
That’s how they got around it and the judges all let it go"
That Kafkaesque….
From what I saw, the Capital Police should be considered un-indicted/co-conspirators. They look like the family Golden Doodle following around the house burglar…. Heck, my dog would growl more…
It will never get any MSM coverage so all the twits out there will never know what happened, and still believe that Sisnick was impaled on a flag pole and burned alive…
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Bookmarks