There's also the case of the USP 9 that went through zero spring replacement through 200,892 rounds (
https://twitter.com/HecklerAndKoch/s...60025396174848), and the USP 45 that went through >297,000 rounds (
https://www.hkpro.com/threads/a-chat.../#post-1204796).
A bit more background on the P30 endurance test:
https://pistol-training.com/p30-thur...eek-forty-two/
TLG did multiple endurance tests, such as an HK45 with 50k rounds (
https://pistol-training.com/hk45-end...hirty-seven-2/), a Gen4 Glock 17 with 71,260 rounds (
https://pistol-training.com/gen4-glo...test-month-16/), and a Springfield/Warren 9mm 1911 with 64,579 rounds (
https://pistol-training.com/springfi...est-report-31/).
I know Chuck Taylor had a Gen2 Glock 17 with >250k rounds:
https://www.ballisticmag.com/glock-1...re-test-ocean/
I guess the real question is, how much does rate of fire matter for handguns in terms of endurance? For rifles, you can certainly burn up the barrel quite a bit faster depending on cadence, would be curious to see how much the extra heat of rapid fire and the like would impact a handgun. I would think that the ammo used would also make a big difference, such as a bunch of +P ammo versus competition bunny farts. I would cautiously think that most reputable modern 9mm handguns with proper care could reach 100k rounds (Glocks, H&Ks, Berettas, and CZs, probably SIGs, FNs, Walthers, and S&Ws, maybe Springfields) with minor parts replacement.
RIP TLG, he was extremely influential in how I started handgun shooting.
Bookmarks