Cyclic rate of fire alone is a ridiculous way of analyzing the effectiveness of a firearm. Just saying.
Cyclic rate of fire alone is a ridiculous way of analyzing the effectiveness of a firearm. Just saying.
One would have to hold the Glock very high to escape the volley of empty cases getting launched into the shooters face at that cyclic rate!
That's the another reason to have a stick mag...makes it easier to hold above face-level while firing.
We find them all the time where I work. We also have shotspotters all over the city and you can hear those and full auto rifles. The glocks are way more common than full auto rifles though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
You’re right, he probably meant Gau-19 so yeah…what an idiot that guy is.
That’s why I was confused, all he said was its got a faster rate of fire, which is correct. I wasn’t sure if there was a different inaccuracy people were commenting on.
Last edited by sidewaysil80; 03-21-23 at 21:35.
Bookmarks