Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 36 of 36

Thread: New full auto Glock gizmo

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    2,767
    Feedback Score
    0
    Cyclic rate of fire alone is a ridiculous way of analyzing the effectiveness of a firearm. Just saying.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,077
    Feedback Score
    0
    One would have to hold the Glock very high to escape the volley of empty cases getting launched into the shooters face at that cyclic rate!

    That's the another reason to have a stick mag...makes it easier to hold above face-level while firing.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    9,559
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by utahjeepr View Post
    Cyclic rate of fire alone is a ridiculous way of analyzing the effectiveness of a firearm. Just saying.
    Said no one ever about the MG 42.
    Gettin' down innagrass.
    Let's Go Brandon!

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    141
    Feedback Score
    0
    We find them all the time where I work. We also have shotspotters all over the city and you can hear those and full auto rifles. The glocks are way more common than full auto rifles though.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    2,767
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by titsonritz View Post
    Said no one ever about the MG 42.
    Well not exactly. The MG 42 had a whole lot going for it in addition to the high rate of fire. Hence the reason it is still in use today all over the world as the MG 3. One of the modifications they have made to it over the original MG 42 is to slow it down.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    884
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by LoboTBL View Post
    Well crap. I didn't assume we were accepting the premise that the M4 is the only thing in the Army inventory to compare it to.
    You’re right, he probably meant Gau-19 so yeah…what an idiot that guy is.

    Quote Originally Posted by utahjeepr View Post
    Cyclic rate of fire alone is a ridiculous way of analyzing the effectiveness of a firearm. Just saying.
    That’s why I was confused, all he said was its got a faster rate of fire, which is correct. I wasn’t sure if there was a different inaccuracy people were commenting on.
    Last edited by sidewaysil80; 03-21-23 at 21:35.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •