Everybody forgets.
Saddam had chemical weapons, ask the Kurds.
9-11 demonstrated he didn't need a missile system to deliver them to us, just had to give them to bad guys and he knew a few. Saddam was behind the Iranian Embassy hostage crisis so he's not above working with terrorists.
Our choices were: Wait until a chemical weapons attack happens in LA OR personally determine Iraq's current NBC capacity because the UN sure as shit isn't able to accomplish anything definitive.
So we did the right thing.
The PROBLEM was, after we determined any chemical weapon capacity or neutralized any terrorist plan to deliver said weapons to the US we should have CONCLUDED our operations, gone down the list of senior people in charge, picked somebody and said "You are now President...do NOT make us come back and do this crap again."
Instead Bush 43 (because he is pretty much the D student everyone claims he was) decided he could "fix" Iraq and the resulting democracy would be so grateful they'd build statues of him and sell us oil really cheap. He didn't seem to understand if they really wanted democracy in Iraq, they would already have it and true to form when given the vote, the result was another Islamic government.
Saddam already presided over the closest thing to a secular democracy in the region, Bush 41 screwed the pooch when he sided with Kuwait over allegations of oil theft (another time the UN failed to find a resolution to a problem that ended in war) and rat****ed an alliance Reagan took years to build.
It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
Chuck, we miss ya man.
كافر
Bookmarks