Originally Posted by
Todd.K
This is probably the most realistic and honest assessment I’ve seen.
We will never know how much the CIA exaggerated to get us into a war vs CYA of troubling but poorly verified intel. I think it is probably some combination of both.
We had more reliable intel for a possible chem weapon attack with Iraqi weapons used against us than any of the warnings that existed for 9-11 and we learned a hard lesson that day about how intel can be very incomplete but the threat still very real.
Of course had the UN been capable of actually doing the job that is the entire purpose of existing, we wouldn't have had to do it.
And if Saddam had simply cooperated with UN inspectors and / or not continuously F'ed around with the US military, we wouldn't have had to do it.
What it came down to was Saddam was a bad bet as a guy who would show restraint. Our real failing was, once again attempting nation building rather than just neutralizing a threat. It pains me to think about all the guys we lost taking places like Mosul and Fallujah only to see them lost to ISIS because we weakened Iraq to the point that it could no longer defend itself and the incompetence of a president who let serious weapon systems fall into the hands of a terrorist group like ISIS.
The sad part is how predictable and preventable all of these things were.
It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
Chuck, we miss ya man.
كافر
Bookmarks