Page 5 of 10 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 95

Thread: Will Trump Be Charged For "Hush $" Payment?

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    2,272
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post
    NY sends someone to an FL court to request extradition. If granted the locals pick him up and put him on a plane. Same as any other interstate extradition.
    The Secret Service will almost certainly have a huge problem with that...
    Religion is doing what you are told no matter what is right. Morality is doing what is right no matter what you are told...

  2. #42
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,424
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post
    NY sends someone to an FL court to request extradition. If granted the locals pick him up and put him on a plane. Same as any other interstate extradition.
    So local, county, state? And if the prioritize other actions above this? Not saying that they won't do it, but we're busy, come back later. When would federal level people get involved? Or does Dog the Bounty Hunter get the job then?
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,751
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by WillBrink View Post
    Do you think the possible charge is over listing paying off said ho as a legal expense ? If not using campaign funds to do it (could he be that dumb?), then it would seem in bold more applicable. Again, unclear of the illegality of paying someone to keep quiet about something as a stand alone charge.
    Does it even matter what the charges are? Its clearly another attempt of the three letter agencies to try and ferment a civil war when their whole Jan 6th insurrection, alt-right, white supremacist narrative fell apart the last few weeks. This is the end state of every bureaucracy, when they get big enough they stop serving their original function and just do things to justify their own existence.
    Forward Ascertainment Group

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    9,925
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    It was back-charged to the campaign.

    Obama, Edwards and Hillary also charged things to the campaign that were not allowed. They had their campaigns fined or nothing happened.
    Do we have proof of that? I haven't seen it.

    Even if so, that would be a minor campaign finance violation worthy of a fine, not a politically motivated local prosecution based on TDS rage.

    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post
    NY sends someone to an FL court to request extradition. If granted the locals pick him up and put him on a plane. Same as any other interstate extradition.
    And said extradition request should rightly be denied if made. NY agents can fly back to NY alone and empty handed, as they deserve.
    What if this whole crusade's a charade?
    And behind it all there's a price to be paid
    For the blood which we dine
    Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    745
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Didn’t previous NY DAs look into this and decide not to prosecute? Didn’t this very same NY DA look into this and decide previously not to prosecute and only changed his mind after Trump announced his intention to run for reelection, or is my info incorrect?

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Phoenix, Az
    Posts
    4,379
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by john armond View Post
    Didn’t previous NY DAs look into this and decide not to prosecute? Didn’t this very same NY DA look into this and decide previously not to prosecute and only changed his mind after Trump announced his intention to run for reelection, or is my info incorrect?
    You are correct. On top of that though, this DA campaigned on the fact that he had prosecuted Trump before (civil court) and believed he should be prosecuted. So now we have guys deciding to prosecute before he was even involved in the case.
    C co 1/30th Infantry Regiment
    3rd Brigade 3rd Infantry Division
    2002-2006
    OIF 1 and 3

    IraqGunz:
    No dude is going to get shot in the chest at 300 yards and look down and say "What is that, a 3 MOA group?"

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    745
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by C-grunt View Post
    You are correct. On top of that though, this DA campaigned on the fact that he had prosecuted Trump before (civil court) and believed he should be prosecuted. So now we have guys deciding to prosecute before he was even involved in the case.
    Looks like the DA is being requested to testify before three congressional committees by Thursday. There are questions about his possible use federal funding for his Trump case and as to him having assistance from Justice Dept staff. Not really seeing this request going anywhere though as it will probably just get ignored.

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...ward-congress/
    Last edited by john armond; 03-21-23 at 19:29.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,515
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    They want Trump completely out of the political arena one way or another. He better steer clear of any grassy knolls if none of their current tactics are effective.

  9. #49
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,424
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by john armond View Post
    Looks like the DA is being requested to testify before three congressional committees by Thursday. There are questions about his possible use federal funding for his Trump case and as to him having assistance from Justice Dept staff. Not really seeing this request going anywhere though as it will probably just get ignored.

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...ward-congress/
    To me, it is all about getting the DA on the record with statements that they can then use to pressure the DOJ to file charges for lying to Congress. The real questions will be who did he talk to about filing charges outside his office, and who in his office talked to people. It's a great perjury trap, and if he declines to answer that says something. The height of hilarity would be if he claims that he can't remember or worse, pleads the 5th. If he tries to say that he can't talk about the case, then the retort is that this should apply to anyone, so he should be able to state that he didn't talk to any dem pols about the case.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    North Alabama
    Posts
    5,311
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    NYC put their 36000 officers on alert, the Capital police erected barriers, etc. A few (hundred?) Pro-Trump protesters showed up, vastly outnumbered by (probably compensated, surely not working class adults with real jobs) counter protesters.

    I am sure Brandon's mouthpiece will spout something something MAGA Threat to Democracy something.

    Andy
    Last edited by AndyLate; 03-22-23 at 08:08.

Page 5 of 10 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •