Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 40

Thread: Bug-out gun of sufficient power/range

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,853
    Feedback Score
    0

    Bug-out gun of sufficient power/range

    Okay, let's say we need something of the size and weight of a Kel Tec Sub2000 but firing 5.56 at minimum. Ability to fold, but doesn't have to function folded. Yeah, the weight won't be like the Sub2000 as it'll need to have sturdier construction, but the ability to fold flat like the Kel Tec. It'd probably need to be a bullpup design......doing some measuring tonight of my Sub2000 vs CAR-15 clone and it was apparent that in order to achieve a 16" folded package it would need to be a bullpup. I have a little backpack stuffed with a few "survival" things has one open pocket left that would accommodate this fantasy weapon nicely.
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    2,872
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    How close would a GAU-5A built with carbon composite and 2055 get to your goal?
    "We must all hang together, or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,853
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Disciple View Post
    How close would a GAU-5A built with carbon composite and 2055 get to your goal?
    Is that the USAF's new folding "survival rifle" for aircrews? If so, might just work.....
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    2,872
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Yes but it doesn't fold, rather the upper separates at the front of the receiver. Slower but smaller than a side-folding AR, and not light which is why I figure exotic carbon/2055 parts would be needed to get close to your target weight.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,312
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Foxtrot Mike makes a 9" folding 5.56.

    I wish they made one in 300blk.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,484
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Disciple View Post
    Yes but it doesn't fold, rather the upper separates at the front of the receiver. Slower but smaller than a side-folding AR, and not light which is why I figure exotic carbon/2055 parts would be needed to get close to your target weight.
    Main problem is the Midwest rail is discontinued, and there ain't a lot compatible with the QRB takedown kit. Mine has a Midwest Combat Rail Lightweight, just slid on until I can get it in to the smith to lop off the parts that make it incompatible; it rocks a small prism sight until the rail is locked on and it's time to install my coupler device. (There's just no way both pieces will fit in the bag I found when enough spacer is stacked in to keep the optic. Frankly, at its expected engagement range in my ecosystem even the irons are probably unnecessary except ya gotta have SOMETHING.)
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,096
    Feedback Score
    0
    There isn't anything like that unless you want a barrel that is stupidly short for 5.56 or you go .300 blk.

    Anything else will be substantially bigger and heavier, including bull-pups. But if you're not willing to drop to a PCC then a bull-pup is your answer.

    The next size up are rifles with folding stocks.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    1,671
    Feedback Score
    0
    Q Honey Badger is too long assembled at 20", but can be broken down to upper and lower. It would be 4.5 lb rather that 4.25 lb, and be in .300 BLK rather than .223 Rem/5.56×45mm.

    SIG Rattler can be had in both .223 Rem/5.56×45mm and .300 BLK, and meet length, but would be ~6 lb.

    Maxim PDX comes in 7.62×39mm, .223 Rem/5.56×45mm, and .300 BLK, but would be 18.75" and 5.625 lb.

    Desert Tech MDRX Micron is a bullpup with an 11.5" barrel that comes in .223 Rem/5.56×45mm, but would be over 7 lb and 24".

    The SCAR 16 CQC has a 10", but would be 21" folded and 6.7 lb.

    A Krinkov-type would be ~20" folded and be >6 lb.

    Basically, you don't really have any choices for that kind of size and weight with a rifle caliber, and even the ones that come close typically have very short barrels.

    I personally don't see much point in a backpack gun as a civilian outside of ease of transport. I have a 10.3" with a LAW folder that fulfills that role, but I don't see it as something I would be deploying straight out the bag. A bullpup with an OAL of 16" would suck to shoot, anyway, it'd be so scrunched up that ergonomics would likely be awful for any normal-sized adult.
    Last edited by Defaultmp3; 03-20-23 at 15:23.
    Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

    老僧三十年前未參禪時、見山是山、見水是水、及至後夾親見知識、有箇入處、見山不是山、見水不是水、而今得箇體歇處、依然見山秪是山、見水秪是水。

    https://www.instagram.com/defaultmp3/

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    WY
    Posts
    1,116
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    My answer to that question is my BRN-180. Its a great firearm to suppress as well.

    Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,484
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by czgunner View Post
    My answer to that question is my BRN-180. Its a great firearm to suppress as well.

    Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
    And what a coinkydink, right as you post that Brownells just blasted out an email announcing a BRN-180S in .300BLK.
    https://www.brownells.com/the-trigge...n-180sh-upper/
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •