For years, I’ve noticed people complain about the Razor 1-10’s performance on 1x on how they can’t get it to feel nearly as flat as the 1-6. My position throughout that time has been that my until Razor’s diopter was more sensitive and therefore, I had to spend more time and attention to getting it set perfectly for my eye but once I did, 1x performance was very similar. So much so that while 1x is the most important factor to me, I sold off my 1-6 and viewed the 1-10 as a more than adequate replacement as I was giving up a very small percentage of 1x performance but gaining FFP and a more useable reticle, an extra 4x, and an easier magnification throw.
Not long ago, I got a second 1-10 and ever since, I’ve struggled to get the diopter set to the same performance as my first one. I just bought a cheap digital caliper to measure the exact distance from the diopter to the scope body so that I could perfectly match them and even though I think they’re as close as reasonably possible, 1x just does not look the same to me.
Because of all of the complaints I’d noticed over the years, I was starting to wonder if there was a noticeable variation from scope to scope that was giving some people the poor 1x performance that’s often complained about while others don’t have an issue.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Bookmarks