Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Top Gun Maverick (Quick Review) 🇺🇸

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Posts
    6,948
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)
    It was a great retro flick. Loved it. Best movie of the year? Eh, I dunno. Worth my money? Every penny.

    Nice to see a testosterone-laden in-your-face movie like this.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Desert SW, USA.
    Posts
    1,357
    Feedback Score
    0
    FYI... Useless movie trivia.

    The original Top Gun movie set the flying hooks into Tom Cruise so hard, he obtained his commercial pilots license and is rated to fly his own business jet. He also owns and flys the P-51 used in the movie. Like him or not, that's a pretty cool deal.

    He was "prohibited" from touching the controls of those F-18s in the scenes for Maverick, but I think it's safe to say that he got a little stick time. No one will ever tell... Well, maybe not until some people retire from the Navy.
    U.S. Army vet. -- Retired 25 year LEO.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    745
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by WillBrink View Post
    That's where I saw it too. Was not gonna pay extra to view that one, but was pleasantly surprised.
    Saw the original in the theater. Had to see this one there too. Just rewatched it for free on Amazon.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Posts
    6,948
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Det-Sog View Post
    FYI... Useless movie trivia.

    The original Top Gun movie set the flying hooks into Tom Cruise so hard, he obtained his commercial pilots license and is rated to fly his own business jet. He also owns and flys the P-51 used in the movie. Like him or not, that's a pretty cool deal.

    He was "prohibited" from touching the controls of those F-18s in the scenes for Maverick, but I think it's safe to say that he got a little stick time. No one will ever tell... Well, maybe not until some people retire from the Navy.
    I have a friend whose dad was a F-14 RIO and Topgun (one word) instructor, did some of the work with the actors for the original. He said all the actors were great to work with but Cruise would ask for extra time, extra books and reference material, etc. He said Cruise would call at 2 am to ask questions, he'd say "Mr. Cruise, can this wait until we meet at 8?", and Cruise would reply "no, I really need to know now" lol.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    4,127
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    I was really ambivalent about the whole thing, but my good friend in DC said it was a good movie and he's not often wrong. I enjoyed it on my flight home from there back in October 22. I'm a cheap ass, and hate movie theatres, so I haven't been to a theatre in 15 years. This was one that I should have seen in the theatre.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    383
    Feedback Score
    0
    Should have been called Iron Eagle 4.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,021
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by WillBrink View Post
    You may have missed the intent, but as a follow up the original, it was spot on. I think it did so well because it hit all the nostalgia buttons, and was old school 80s style action fun. No damn politics, no woke BS, etc, etc, just escapism. Truth is, many favorite 80s classics where not great movies and don't age well if you watch them now. Top Gun was not a great movie, but it was peak 80s fun. I think this movie recreated it perfectly. As a stand alone film? No, not great.
    So I can still watch Top Gun as a stand alone film, which is why I didn't need this remake. I'm glad they didn't "Disney" it to death, but they really didn't do anything beyond almost make the exact same film. I was hoping for more.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,021
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    [QUOTE=WillBrink;3097459]In my world view, Yeager makes Chuck Norris look like a pu$$y.



    Kittinger did it without a plane.

    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Sea of Japan
    Posts
    1,121
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I liked it. I can see the Death Star comparisons, yeah. But I think what it did well was develop the Pete Mitchell character and his relationships, past and present. The flying footage was pretty good, too.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    480
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    This movie brought me back to the 80s and all the feels with it. If you saw the original when it came out and remember how that felt; they were able to bottle up those feelings and open them all up again nearly forty years later. That is an amazing feat and everyone involved in the project should be commended for that. It was something we all needed in 2022.

    As to the critics of the movie, you have to separate the tongue-in-cheek plot elements (obvious nod to Star Wars and Iron Eagle films from the eighties) from the fantastic job they did filming practical effects, real jets, amazing camera work showing aerial maneuvers, showcasing F-35 in the intro, maneuverability of fifth gen fighters, etc. They didn't get the sound of the cannons right, but nobody's perfect! In an age of CGI, they had all the actors up in real F-18s filming their scenes. There will never be another movie with this level of access to actual military jets.

    Some other small things that I appreciated: the Hind helicopter really brought me back to my childhood watching Rambo. The dialogue between Rooster and Maverick had lines from the first movie between Goose and Maverick when they were up against Viper and Jester. It gave me chills and brought new meaning to the line, "Talk to me Goose."

    As someone has mentioned, the real plot of the movie is about Pete Mitchell; growth from someone who left his wingman into someone who stayed faithful to his friend and realized the importance of family and sacrifice for others.

    This Youtube channel has a series of great breakdowns by F-18 pilots that weren't involved with the movie. Obviously, there are spoilers!
    Last edited by crosseyedshooter; 03-29-23 at 11:37.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •