Very strange indeed.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/31/us/la...nts/index.html
A cache of newly released FBI documents reveals Stephen Paddock, the gambler who carried out the deadliest mass shooting in modern US history in Las Vegas in 2017, may have harbored resentment over how he and other high rollers were treated by casinos.
The heavily redacted documents – which include hundreds of pages of investigation records, evidence inventories and interviews with people who knew Paddock – also provide a fuller picture of the gunman’s obsessive gambling habits.
Though the FBI said in 2019 Paddock’s actions were not driven by a grievance against any particular casino or hotel, one fellow gambler interviewed by investigators after the attack said Paddock had become angry about how casinos generally dealt with VIP players.
The gambler, whose name is redacted, told the FBI Paddock was “upset at the way casinos were treating him and other high rollers” and he believed the frustration could have caused the gunman to “snap,” according to the documents.
The gambler said while casinos typically treated high rollers to perks like free cruises and flights, he believed the venues’ approach to such players had changed in the years leading up to the shooting, including banning them from some hotels or casinos, the documents said.
So he shot the place up, but didn't shoot up the Casino that was treating him poorly, he shot up an innocent crowd?
I aint buying it. Casino Security is no joke, but how many handguns are carried in and out daily?
He could have as easily done more damage to the Casino by shooting up the gaming room.
Naahh this is all some BS.
Bookmarks