|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last edited by hotbiggun42; 06-09-23 at 17:22.
I tried to follow the science but it simply was not there. I then followed the money, thats where i found the science.
Last edited by vicious_cb; 06-09-23 at 18:23.
Forward Ascertainment Group
Might not kill you, but…
![]()
I’m not going to make any recommendations. I have a couple mags of whatever Gold Dot I bought seven years ago for HD, and 77gr IMI split between a couple SBR’s and a precision carbine. My point, which your post confirms, is that anything coming out of an AR is going to be a bad day for someone in most situations.
I don't get it, people make recommendations about getting a BCM or DD over the Bushmaster or Andersen gun all the time on the forum then when it comes to ammo people are all of a sudden taking the equivalent of "all ARs are the same quality". People end up stuffing which is essentially Bushmaster quality ammo into their mags with a 15% chance it won't work as intended. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. Call me crazy but the AR is a system, if you are optimizing for a particular use or situation shouldnt ammo be part of the equation?
But hey, when was the last time someone was kilt in da streets because their Bushmaster failed, unlikely to happen right?
Forward Ascertainment Group
“You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our heart is restless until it rests in you.” -Augustine
LOL! Well, one thing I found interesting was someone posted a thread not too long ago. Last year? Where they compared some of the different XM193 type ammo brands that were available, and none of it was consistent with real M193. Different jacket thicknesses, slightly different bullet construction. Might have been a Molon thread. It definitely can't be counted on to behave like real M193. Prior to reading that, I had thought it was all pretty much the same.
M193 then get a 75/77gr otm
Bookmarks