|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Like the other guy said, if perfected, this has major benefits in 2/3-Gun and PRS. Many a stages I’ve had to find an “acceptable” or one sizes fits all mag setting because the time it would take/compromising position wouldn’t be worth changing magnification for new target. This would allow folks to use ideal mag settings for each target rather then making due with one, without the time/position penalty.
Last edited by sidewaysil80; 05-22-23 at 22:21.
If you already have a red dot beside the LPVO isn't it faster to just roll the gun or lift your head?
"We must all hang together, or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately."
In no way do I make any money from anyone related to the firearms industry.
"I have never heard anyone say after a firefight that I wish that I had not taken so much ammo.", ME
"Texas can make it without the United States, but the United States can't make it without Texas !", General Sam Houston
Would definitely be interesting to see what kind of Rube Goldberg bullshite it going on inside that mount but I think Ill be sticking with my Throw Levers thanks.
Forward Ascertainment Group
It's the first step in the direction people want of the "future weapons program".
A stock with a big battery pack to have a top rail with some form of connector to power your optics and lights/nvg stuff.
They said something that some day there will be an motor of sorts that will just be switch activated to adjust the zoom ring.
With this in mind imagine how well the new military optic system will evolve.
People talking shit about this now are the same people who looked down on the ar15, and every evolution of concepts that we now hold true for the modern weapon system.
Remember how most things started in a shed 200 years ago?
Why do they have an offset reddot if they will be adjusting back down to 1x. Just leave the LPVO on 6x and be done with it.
Servo and a thumb switch… they’d sell.
Bookmarks