Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Black Hills 5.56mm 77 Grain Tipped MatchKing Accuracy Evaluation Update

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,521
    Feedback Score
    0

    Black Hills 5.56mm 77 Grain Tipped MatchKing Accuracy Evaluation Update

    Black Hills 5.56mm 77 Grain Tipped MatchKing Accuracy Evaluation Update





    In 2016 I posted an in-depth review of the Black Hills 5.56 77 grain Tipped MatchKing ammunition. Three 10-shot groups of that 2016 lot had an average extreme spread of 1.26”. The smallest of those groups had an extreme spread of 1.14” with a mean radius of 0.39”.







    The cartridge overall length for the 2016 lot of the Black Hills 77 grain Tipped MatchKing averaged 2.246”, while the 2023 lot averaged 2.243”. The length of the bullet itself is basically the same for both lots. The 2016 lot was loaded in Winchester brass and the 2023 lot is loaded in Lake City brass with stab primer crimps. Both lots have sealant in the primer pockets and neither lot has sealant at the case mouth.




    In my 2016 review, I noted that the 77 grain Tipped MatchKing was one of the longest bullets being commercially loaded to magazine length in the 5.56mm cartridge and that it had such a long ogive that the cannelure extended past the bearing surface of the bullet and onto the ogive, giving the grooves of the cannelure a rather unique “arrowhead” appearance.











    The base to ogive measurement of the bullets in the 2023 lot is approximately 0.017” longer than the 2016 lot and the configuration of the bullet at the junction of the bearing surface and the ogive now allows for a full-fledged cannelure that does not appear to extend into the ogive, or it was just a matter of pressing the deep cannelure that makes it appear so.





    A 10-shot group of the 2023 lot of the Black Hills 5.56mm 77 grain Tipped MatchKing ammunition fired from the same Lothar Walther barreled AR-15 used to test the 2016 lot, fired under the same conditions from a distance of 100 yards had an extreme spread of 0.86” and a mean radius of 0.24”.





    I’ll be posting chronograph data for the 2023 lot in the near future.


    …..
    All that is necessary for trolls to flourish, is for good men to do nothing.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,948
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Interesting change in the cannalure.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Mid-West, USA
    Posts
    2,826
    Feedback Score
    63 (100%)
    Excellent thread. Thanks, Molon.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    637
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    I'm learning, and know I'm simplifying but....Between 2016 and these recent loads, extreme spread went down ~25% and the changes were bullet length, cannelure, case & primer manufacturer? Using the same powder?

    Sounds like a pretty good update to a solid loading from a solid company. I've used anything I can get (some good some crappy) over the past few years in 62gr or 77gr for my Noveske N4 and may have to pick some of these up if they're readily available.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,521
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ndmiller View Post
    I'm learning, and know I'm simplifying but....Between 2016 and these recent loads, extreme spread went down ~25% and the changes were bullet length, cannelure, case & primer manufacturer? Using the same powder?

    Sounds like a pretty good update to a solid loading from a solid company. I've used anything I can get (some good some crappy) over the past few years in 62gr or 77gr for my Noveske N4 and may have to pick some of these up if they're readily available.
    Bullet and cartridge length are basically the same. Cannelure/configuration at the ogive are the most noticeable change along with different cases. We have no way of knowing what powder was used in the pre-covid load or the current load.
    ....
    All that is necessary for trolls to flourish, is for good men to do nothing.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Utah, USA
    Posts
    1,737
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    .86" 10 shot groups is really impressive for factory ammo. I'm happy when I get .75" with my handloads in an AR.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    383
    Feedback Score
    0
    Did you happen to chrono this load?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,521
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by MarshallDodge View Post
    .86" 10 shot groups is really impressive for factory ammo.
    Particularly since it's a 5.56 velocity load.

    ...
    All that is necessary for trolls to flourish, is for good men to do nothing.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,521
    Feedback Score
    0
    I chronographed two different lots of the 2023 Black Hills 5.56mm 77 grain Tipped MatchKing ammunition from an AR-15 with a chrome-lined, NATO chambered, 20” Colt barrel with a 1:7” twist.





    The muzzle velocity that I obtained from the 2016 lot of this ammunition is shown in the table below. Black Hills now advertises that this load has a velocity of 2750 FPS from a 20” test barrel.






    Chronographing was conducted using an Oehler 35-P chronograph with “proof screen” technology. The Oehler 35P chronograph is actually two chronographs in one package that takes two separate chronograph readings for each shot (primary velocity and proof velocity) and then compares those readings to a statistical table to determine if there is any significant difference between the two readings to determine if the primary velocity is a valid reading or likely to be an erroneous reading. If there is an erroneous reading, the chronograph “flags” the shot to let you know that shot is invalid. There were no invalid shots flagged during this testing.

    The velocity stated below is the muzzle velocity as calculated from the instrumental velocity using Oehler’s Ballistic Explorer software program. The string of fire consisted of 10 rounds over the chronograph.[/SIZE]








    Each round was single-loaded and cycled into the chamber from a magazine fitted with a single-load follower. The bolt locked-back after each shot allowing the chamber to cool in between each shot. This technique was used to mitigate the possible influence of “chamber-soak” on velocity data. Each new shot was fired in a consistent manner after hitting the bolt release. Atmospheric conditions were monitored and recorded using a Kestrel 4000 Pocket Weather Tracker.







    Atmospheric conditions

    Temperature: 71 degrees F
    Humidity: 42.5%
    Barometric pressure: 30.05 inches of Hg
    Elevation: 950 feet above sea level

    The muzzle velocity for lot #703 was 2779 FPS with a standard deviation of 16 FPS. This lot had a coefficient of variation of 0.58%.

    The muzzle velocity for lot #723 was 2762 FPS with a standard deviation of 21 FPS and a coefficient of variation of 0.76%.


    For those of you who might not be familiar with the coefficient of variation (CV), it is the standard deviation, divided by the mean (average) muzzle velocity and then multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage. It allows for the comparison of the uniformity of velocity between loads with different muzzle velocities.

    For comparison, the mil-spec for M193 allows for a coefficient of variation of approximately 1.2%, while one of my best 77 grain OTM hand-loads, with a muzzle velocity of 2639 PFS and a standard deviation of 4 FPS, has a coefficient of variation of 0.15%.

    ….
    All that is necessary for trolls to flourish, is for good men to do nothing.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •