Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31

Thread: CA 10 Round Mag LImit Destroyed [Again]

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    The Absent Minded Perfesser
    Posts
    8,049
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SpecWired View Post
    Anyone remember when people bought into the notion of, where California goes, so goes the USA?

    Thankfully that notion didn't age well. Now bring on the NFA challenges. Whole notion of NFA needs to be abolished.
    Ideally yes, but we need to rip out GCA68 root and branch, Sporter Clause in particular, first.
    Last edited by Diamondback; 09-27-23 at 09:58.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    Ye best start believin' in Orwellian Dystopias, mateys... yer LIVIN' in one!--after Capt. Hector Barbossa
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,092
    Feedback Score
    0
    I Gayin Newsom signed some new laws today. Same old BS, New SB number…

    It is AWESOME to hear them whine and moan about Bruen and how it royally screws with their plans to disarm us, for now. The problem is that they will keep filing and passing these BS laws, and the courts are too slow to deal with them. Something has to change.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    317
    Feedback Score
    0
    Coincidence Judge Benitez released his decision on Bonta’s birthday. LOL

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    The Absent Minded Perfesser
    Posts
    8,049
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Lacos View Post
    Coincidence Judge Benitez released his decision on Bonta’s birthday. LOL
    Y'know, given how they take great joy from pooping in OUR punchbowls, I say some Bowl Blastering in theirs like Benitez just did to Bonta is long overdue.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    Ye best start believin' in Orwellian Dystopias, mateys... yer LIVIN' in one!--after Capt. Hector Barbossa
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    The South
    Posts
    4,420
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post
    Ideally yes, but we need to rip out GCA68 root and branch, Sporting Clause in particular, first.
    Agreed. The entire 68 GCA and 922(o) need to be repealed.
    SLG Defense 07/02 FFL/SOT

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    The Absent Minded Perfesser
    Posts
    8,049
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by JoshNC View Post
    Agreed. The entire 68 GCA and 922(o) need to be repealed.
    I typed "Sporter," apparently my phone did it's auto-incorrect thing again.

    Bad news, right after Benitez dropped his ruling a Biden judge in Eastern District WA just went out of her way to crap all over both it and SCOTUS with every sentence of her refusal to issue a Prelim Injunction against our own ban. I think her intent is to see how much of our team's money she can waste before the final stomping, see if her pal Pedo Bob can win by outspending us.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    Ye best start believin' in Orwellian Dystopias, mateys... yer LIVIN' in one!--after Capt. Hector Barbossa
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    1,446
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post
    I typed "Sporter," apparently my phone did it's auto-incorrect thing again.

    Bad news, right after Benitez dropped his ruling a Biden judge in Eastern District WA just went out of her way to crap all over both it and SCOTUS with every sentence of her refusal to issue a Prelim Injunction against our own ban. I think her intent is to see how much of our team's money she can waste before the final stomping, see if her pal Pedo Bob can win by outspending us.
    Judges were never meant to make law from the bench nor to be activists, it should be a federal crime for them to do it.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    The Absent Minded Perfesser
    Posts
    8,049
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ubet View Post
    Judges were never meant to make law from the bench nor to be activists, it should be a federal crime for them to do it.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    5 to 10 at hard labor followed by a lifetime ban on elected/appointed office sounds fair to me...
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    Ye best start believin' in Orwellian Dystopias, mateys... yer LIVIN' in one!--after Capt. Hector Barbossa
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Bora Bora
    Posts
    5,760
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    -Self Moderated-
    Last edited by HKGuns; 09-27-23 at 14:03.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,092
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ubet View Post
    Judges were never meant to make law from the bench nor to be activists, it should be a federal crime for them to do it.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    The Four Boxes DIner guy took that ruling apart. The odd thing is that her ruling is self refuting. As in she will cite sources and arguments, but have the wrong conclusion from them. It was just for a PI, so maybe she’ll unscrew herself (doubtful) for a full ruling.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •