99% of the AR owners will never wear their guns out. I never worry about shooting my barrels hot and letting it rip. Buy what you want and shoot it as often as possible.
PB
99% of the AR owners will never wear their guns out. I never worry about shooting my barrels hot and letting it rip. Buy what you want and shoot it as often as possible.
PB
"Air Force / Policeman / Fireman / Man of God / Friend of mine / R.I.P. Steve Lamy"
I always understood that M4 barrels wear out at the gas port not the chamber, port erosion is going to be faster the higher the pressure and as port opens up parts wear increases. The port pressure of the M4 at 7.8” from the bolt face is 17,000 psi, while port pressure at 13” from bolt face of the M16 is 10,000 psi, I don't know what it is for mid but it's got to be somewhere in the middle so all other factors being equal a mid barrel will last longer. And bolt breakage is common in high round counts.
“The Trump Doctrine is ‘We’re America, Bitch.’ That’s the Trump Doctrine.”
"He is free to evade reality, he is free to unfocus his mind and stumble blindly down any road he pleases, but not free to avoid the abyss he refuses to see."
I dont know about you but I haven't heard of anyone junking barrels because their gas ports eroded, they are junked because they start keyholing (rare) or accuracy drops below a certain threshold. Even .mil barrels are getting junked because of throat erosion using go/no-go gauges.
Honestly junking a barrel because of an eroded gas port sounds like a waste, if its still shooting good throw a heavier buffer in and keep shooting till accuracy drops off.
Forward Ascertainment Group
Yes, port erosion at the carbine location does occur at a faster rate than it does at mid and rifle locations. Is a barrel considered worn out due to a measurement of the gas port (never heard of it), by measurement at the throat and muzzle (yep), or by measurement of group sizes (yep)?
Papabear's statement is absolutely correct. Barrel life outside of a competition rifle is basically meaningless, and a service rifle barrel will be replaced loooong before bolt life comes into play.
Last edited by grizzman; 10-30-23 at 22:10.
Probably because you can't, if you look at how gas port erosion happens its oblong and looks like a streak that heads off towards the muzzle.
I dont know if its because bolt manufacturing just got better over time even using the same materials but Ive never broken a bolt that wasnt already defective to begin with(you'll know its a bad bolt within a few thousand rounds). All my retired barrels retired with their original bolts that lasted the life of the barrel.
Last edited by vicious_cb; 10-30-23 at 22:22.
Forward Ascertainment Group
Port erosion is irrelevant to most users, and barrels go when they don't shoot to requirements anymore. That said, it is one of several indicators useful in assessing barrels doing precision or test-article work. If you have a bore scope, it can be interesting to watch throat and port erosion over time.
2012 National Zumba Endurance Champion
الدهون القاع الفتيات لك جعل العالم هزاز جولة الذهاب
So, to understand the summary, I would probably not see much of a difference, but to buy what I can get my hands on and run with it, knowing that mid-length will likely last a bit longer. Understandingly, that's going to be very dependent on barrel quality. I have already purchased a BCM bolt, so I doubt that'll be a failure point.
"Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill.
https://learningfromhistory.weebly.com/
"What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v
Bookmarks