Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 51

Thread: Shooting down cheap drones not cost effective for US Navy

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,863
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TAZ View Post
    Since when has any government entity done things in an efficient and cost effective manner??

    They need to be able to protect themselves, so I have zero issues with whacking the drones. Might be better to whack the shooters but that’s a political CF in normal days much less now.

    We just need to up production. Maybe reroute some of that wasted foreign aid $$$ to places like Asscrackistan, and God knows what other useless places we but money at into production.
    I would tend to agree that is the solution, or at least a major part of it.
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Great lakes
    Posts
    739
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    It isn't hard to spend an enemy over the cliff.

    Saddam was doing that, he'd threaten the US and we'd start ramping up a US response and then he'd stop being a threat. But the effort still cost the US military millions of dollars. That was the point.

    In this instance, low cost drones can quickly raise the cost of defensive operations into multi million dollar amounts. I don't think this is a case of bean counters not wanting to protect lives but the realization that we need a more cost effective solution to the problem. Not everything needs a super sophisticated high tech solution, especially low tech threats.

    Those 2 million dollar missiles were designed to deal with things like enemy fighters and incoming missiles.
    I agree that designing future platforms to accommodate the low tech risk is appropriate. But, this smells like some Biden DOD official lamenting the expenditure of money when it is well known that our current ordnance capabilities have been depleted. Pissing and moaning that a US warship is spending too much money protecting itself and accomplishing the task at hand is bullshit.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,090
    Feedback Score
    0
    If an Apache or Cobra could intercept them and match (or exceed) their speed then cannon fire would be a cheap solution.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    The Sticks, TN
    Posts
    4,186
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    The most effective response would be for the USN to vaporize the drone launch sites as soon as they are detected.
    Philippians 2:10-11

    To argue with a person who renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. ~ Thomas Paine

    “The greatest conspiracy theory is the notion that your government cares about you”- unknown.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,449
    Feedback Score
    0
    Lazers, even sharks with lasers.

    Quote Originally Posted by Krazykarl View Post
    I agree that designing future platforms to accommodate the low tech risk is appropriate. But, this smells like some Biden DOD official lamenting the expenditure of money when it is well known that our current ordnance capabilities have been depleted. Pissing and moaning that a US warship is spending too much money protecting itself and accomplishing the task at hand is bullshit.
    Uhm, pretty sure it isn't a money thing. First off its a magazine/cell thing, then it is a global supply of missles thing. You can 3d print and put an Aurdino board with some c4 and make something that would wreck havoc on the topsides of our aluminum cans. Maybe $15k per killer drone. The dollars are more just a representation of how many there could be.

    The solution is anti-drone drone swarms.

    The gold-plated defense-contractor dream weapon systems designed to add every capability for every dime to sink the Kirov and hold back Backfire bombers is going to get its ass handed to it by 3D printed drones for pennies on the dollar.

    Where are all this pieces-of-crap 'targets' that where cLittoral boats? Let those take the hits.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    836
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by flenna View Post
    The most effective response would be for the USN to vaporize the drone launch sites as soon as they are detected.
    This. This right here. Then start on suspected drone launch sites.
    ~Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.
    Thomas Jefferson

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,487
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    I think you are gonna need something faster, but yeah something like ship mounted radar / gps targeting rotary guns probably need to be looked at.
    Like I said a while back, lots of Goalkeepers and Phalanxes, maybe M134 Miniguns for the small and cheap threats.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Black Hills, South Dakota
    Posts
    4,688
    Feedback Score
    0
    This seems like a great mission for the Dumwalt class. Spin up a bunch 155mm HE shells that can be fired in the guns, put all of them on station steaming up and down the Yemeni coast dispensing steel rain on anything within 20 miles of the coast that has anything rise above the horizon on radar.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    District 11
    Posts
    6,348
    Feedback Score
    24 (100%)
    Blow up what needs to be blown up. Can't let a bunch of goofball pirates harass shipping in the area. I am sick of inflation.
    Let those who are fond of blaming and finding fault, while they sit safely at home, ask, ‘Why did you not do thus and so?’I wish they were on this voyage; I well believe that another voyage of a different kind awaits them.”

    Christopher Columbus

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    9,930
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by flenna View Post
    The most effective response would be for the USN to vaporize the drone launch sites as soon as they are detected.
    That would require someone in the Biden Administration to actually have a set of balls. They don’t have a single nut between them.
    What if this whole crusade's a charade?
    And behind it all there's a price to be paid
    For the blood which we dine
    Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •