Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 45

Thread: Just how big were the Iowa class battleships?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,863
    Feedback Score
    0

    Just how big were the Iowa class battleships?

    Pic of the USS Wisconsin sitting next to the resurrected hulk of the USS Oklahoma in Pearl Harbor, circa 1944. Oklahoma was a Nevada class, old-style battleship.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File...ma_H78940t.jpg
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,448
    Feedback Score
    0
    They made them long to get the speed up. I saw a recent video of models of the Iowas versus the Yamato, and I was surprised that the Iowas weren't that much smaller looking. I think the Yamato had a higher freeboard though. When I went to Pearl Harbor and walked the deck of the Missouri(?), I was surprised how much of an up-swing there was to the bow. It looks flat in pics, but it seems you are pretty high up when you get all the way to the bow.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,863
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by FromMyColdDeadHand View Post
    They made them long to get the speed up. I saw a recent video of models of the Iowas versus the Yamato, and I was surprised that the Iowas weren't that much smaller looking. I think the Yamato had a higher freeboard though. When I went to Pearl Harbor and walked the deck of the Missouri(?), I was surprised how much of an up-swing there was to the bow. It looks flat in pics, but it seems you are pretty high up when you get all the way to the bow.
    Yes, each progressive class past the old WWI battleships (like were at Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941) got longer: the South Dakota class was longer, then the North Carolina class was a bit more, and then finally the Iowa class was our longest. In fact, the Iowa class was ~ 140' longer than the North Carolina vessels , which in turn was ~ 50' longer than the South Dakota ones. They sure stretched them out.
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    N AZ
    Posts
    372
    Feedback Score
    0
    "The lowas were immense ships, with
    some 175 tons of blueprint paper alone
    in the class's 430,000 man-days of
    design and each vessel's 3,300,000 man-
    days of construction time
    Each was crafted with:
    4,300,000 feet of welding
    90 miles of piping
    15,000 valves
    300 miles of electric cables (some of
    them armored)
    900 electric motors
    312,000 pounds of paint
    15 miles of manila and wire rope
    1,857 access openings (161 hatches, 844
    doors, and 852 manholes)."

    USS Iowa is the only one I've seen up close, and it was an awe-inspiring experience. I'm not ashamed to say, an emotional one too. It's crazy they were built using drafting tables and slide rules. Not to mention the ass-busting labor that went into the construction.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,865
    Feedback Score
    0
    IIRC, the post-WW1 Washington Naval Treaty limited the size of warships (which forced some undesirable compromises in their designs). The Montana class battleships would have been even larger if they weren’t canceled.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,863
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ThirdWatcher View Post
    IIRC, the post-WW1 Washington Naval Treaty limited the size of warships (which forced some undesirable compromises in their designs). The Montana class battleships would have been even larger if they weren’t canceled.
    The Montana's would have had 4 turrets with 3 guns each; the Iowa's had 3 such turrets. The Montana class would have been 921' long, about 50'+ longer than the Iowa class.
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Black Hills, South Dakota
    Posts
    4,688
    Feedback Score
    0
    Not just longer and more heavily armed. The Montana class would have had main belt armor that was resistant to 16”/50 AP shell fire, so considerable more heavily armored and still maintaining a design speed of 27-28 knots which might have been exceeded in reality.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,863
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Coal Dragger View Post
    Not just longer and more heavily armed. The Montana class would have had main belt armor that was resistant to 16”/50 AP shell fire, so considerable more heavily armored and still maintaining a design speed of 27-28 knots which might have been exceeded in reality.
    Can you imagine that biotch with a nuclear reactor as a power source? Put the hammer down and it'll run "hot" indefinitely.
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    303
    Feedback Score
    0
    Here's a comparison between the USS Iowa & The Bismarck:
    “Detached Reflection Cannot Be Demanded in the Presence of an Uplifted Knife” ~ Brown v. United States (1921)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,236
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    I've been on the WI, NJ, MO and IA.

    They're pretty big!

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •