https://magpul.com/tmag-30-ar-m4-gen-m3.html
Part of me wonders if they are trolling.
https://magpul.com/tmag-30-ar-m4-gen-m3.html
Part of me wonders if they are trolling.
“God doesn’t need your good works, but your neighbor does.” - Luther
Originally Posted by 1168
They sure look interesting. But I'm beyond flush on AR mags, and I have plenty of Lancer mags anyway.
“You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our heart is restless until it rests in you.” -Augustine
I don't know why they would be trolling. They also announced P320 mags today.
98% Sarcastic. 100% Overthinking things and making up reasons for buying a new firearm.
Late to the party as usual lol
I'll probably stick with lancers and okay mags
Last edited by Razorblade; 01-15-24 at 18:42.
It is hard to be serious about this when Lancer has been making them ever since Magpul couldn't. These don't appear to be recommended for 300BLK use for those people who care.
Magpul does have .mil contracts for PMAGs, so maybe this gets yet another foot in the door for them.
Stick
Board policy mandates I state that I shoot for BCM. I have also done work for 200 or so manufacturers within the firearm community. I am prior service, a full time LEO, firearm instructor, armorer, TL, martial arts instructor, and all around good guy.
I also shoot and write for various publications. Let me know if you know cool secrets or have toys worthy of an article...
Flickr Tumblr Facebook Instagram RECOILMAGAZINE OFF GRID RECOIL WEB
Nothing about these makes me want to spend $24 on them.
Looks like I'll be sticking to milspec mags as well. Although my most recent purchases have been Lancers that seem to work very well.
Must say something about me that I usually don't say yes to all the "popular" crap like Pmags and gLoCk's.
I'm typing this looking at over 150 AR15 mags and I count a total of 8 AR15 Pmags. Most of mine are NMHTG / Okay AL - HK polymer and C-Products stainless. I have another hundred Brownells milspec sitting in an ammo can in their original packaging, just in case.
This is only one section of my allocated Mag storage space.
Last edited by HKGuns; 01-17-24 at 08:08.
I think they realized they are missing a big part of the market. While window mags suffice for me and I rarely stop engaging targets to check my magazine levels (I usually sorta count bursts or doubles when in semi) and rely a lot on bolt hold opens I have from time to time checked when shooting AUGs or SIG 550 series rifles.
I sorta wish they'd give us a standard MP5 mag and start cranking out mags for the HK 33/93 series.
It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
Chuck, we miss ya man.
كافر
After they spent two decades telling us we can’t have translucent mags because it’s not possible according to them. A day late and a dollar short. Lancer mags all the way.
Maybe it wasn't possible for them at the time. Obviously SIG and Steyr have been doing it since the 1970s.
I don't own any Lancers so I'm not qualified to comment on them. But I've been pretty happy with my Pmags since they started cranking them out. As someone who lived through the Clinton ban, you cannot have enough quality magazine manufacturers because someday this merry go round is probably gonna come to an end and a market flooded with millions of prebans is a good thing.
It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
Chuck, we miss ya man.
كافر
Bookmarks