Non-ARs for collection before State AWB

[SteyrAUG]

I’ve always wanted an FNC.

[titsonritz]

That is a sweet unit right there.

[FromMyColdDeadHand]

Ugh, and they are working on an AWB for CO. Hasn't made the wide news yet. A-holes.

[SteyrAUG]

Ugh, and they are working on an AWB for CO. Hasn't made the wide news yet. A-holes.

You haven't seen this coming since the magazine ban?

[FromMyColdDeadHand]

You haven't seen this coming since the magazine ban?

Oh, yes. They tried to do an AWB last few years but Pole-smoker wanted a 'clean' state look and not political drama for him to be VP. I really did think that Bruen methodology would be adopted faster. We have local 'separation' and a local town tried to put an AWB in place and the Federal judge put it on hold pending cases like MD, CA and others. That was at least a year ago. If I had to guess, the AWB will get pushed back while the CCW and some others get passed. Just a guess.

I frankly have more ARs and goodies than I know what to do with and that is along with some for my son. As a collector and gear head, I thought I might branch out. While the AWB doesn't have a registry (now), we are a UBC state though, there is odd language in the bill that makes it sound like you can never sell the AWs you have. Obviously, sales are not allowed, but we can't tell if that is just odd wording to keep family transers down, or a literal 'die with it' with out the ability to sell it, even through an FFL to another state.

[Bret]

I really did think that Bruen methodology would be adopted faster.

In case you haven't figured it out, the majority of the leftist judges do not care on bit about Bruen or any other precedent. They may get overturned, but they don't care and they know that the Supreme Court can't take every case. You should not be surprised by this as they're the same people that can find abortion and gay marriage in the Constitution but can't find the right to firearm ownership.

[SteyrAUG]

Oh, yes. They tried to do an AWB last few years but Pole-smoker wanted a 'clean' state look and not political drama for him to be VP. I really did think that Bruen methodology would be adopted faster. We have local 'separation' and a local town tried to put an AWB in place and the Federal judge put it on hold pending cases like MD, CA and others. That was at least a year ago. If I had to guess, the AWB will get pushed back while the CCW and some others get passed. Just a guess.

I frankly have more ARs and goodies than I know what to do with and that is along with some for my son. As a collector and gear head, I thought I might branch out. While the AWB doesn't have a registry (now), we are a UBC state though, there is odd language in the bill that makes it sound like you can never sell the AWs you have. Obviously, sales are not allowed, but we can't tell if that is just odd wording to keep family transers down, or a literal 'die with it' with out the ability to sell it, even through an FFL to another state.

If you own them in CO, you should be able to move out of state with them, which means you should be able to sell them out of state. This crap they keep coming up with is just insane. But with the massive influx of CA crazies, you guys were screwed from the start. Talk about political gentrification.

[kerplode]

I frankly have more ARs and goodies than I know what to do with and that is along with some for my son. As a collector and gear head, I thought I might branch out. While the AWB doesn't have a registry (now), we are a UBC state though, there is odd language in the bill that makes it sound like you can never sell the AWs you have. Obviously, sales are not allowed, but we can't tell if that is just odd wording to keep family transers down, or a literal 'die with it' with out the ability to sell it, even through an FFL to another state.

My cursory reading of pending CO AWB leads me to believe that you could sell/move them out of state but they could never be transferred to anyone in state including family members. But there's currently no registration in the bill.

The NM thing we're fixin' to get shoved down our throats via special session will allow transfers between "immediate family members", however all included firearms will need to be registered with the state in order to be legally processed in the first place. If you do transfer to an "immediate family member" they have 7 days to update the registry. Since everyone is related in this state, you could theoretically move something to more or less anyone using the "7 degrees of Kevin Bacon" method.

So yeah, both will become law, both will suck in their own way, and both will be in place for years if not forever.

[kerplode]

But with the massive influx of CA crazies, you guys were screwed from the start. Talk about political gentrification.

The moment CO went mail-in-by-default back in 2013 it was game over.

[FromMyColdDeadHand]

If you own them in CO, you should be able to move out of state with them, which means you should be able to sell them out of state. This crap they keep coming up with is just insane. But with the massive influx of CA crazies, you guys were screwed from the start. Talk about political gentrification.

Even the wife is on board for getting out. Daughter has a new boyfriend whose family is also looking at moving soon too. Just met him and he started talking guns, I was like- "Really, tell me more this 6.5 Creedwater?". My wife and daughter shifted the convo. My daughter brings home these doe-eyed conservative boys, and trades them out too fast...