Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Nature vs (expensive) manmade beaches?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,084
    Feedback Score
    0

    Nature vs (expensive) manmade beaches?

    Apparently the smart money is on nature:

    "The owners of beachfront homes in the seaside community of Salisbury Beach in northern Massachusetts spent nearly $600,000 to have about 15,000 tons of sand dropped near their properties to protect themselves from future storms.

    But the Atlantic Ocean had something else coming. The high tide and winds that pounded the area Sunday washed nearly half of the sand away, mere days after it was placed.

    The storm left the beach area stripped and defenseless before the ocean waters that draw vacationers to that beach town every year.

    “People are depressed, discouraged, angry,” said Tom Saab, president of Salisbury Beach Citizens for Change, a group representing property owners that spearheaded the sand project. “The dunes did their job. They sacrificed themselves to protect the properties — no properties were really damaged.”

    The citizens group decided in January to purchase the sand that was placed in mid-February along a 1.5-mile stretch of Salisbury Beach near the properties, Saab said. About 150 buildings line the stretch of beach, including single houses and condos. The beach stretches for about 4 miles, and the adjoining properties are estimated to be collectively worth $2 billion, he said."


    https://www.yahoo.com/news/beach-tow...173247274.html
    Last edited by Slater; 03-15-24 at 14:51.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,948
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Give the properties to Bidens 2 digit IQ illegals!
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    325
    Feedback Score
    0
    Anything man can build, nature can destroy. Was always amused by ordinances saying you have to build above the 100yr flood plain. Heck, I figger if'n it hasn't rained that hard in 100 yrs, it's about time for to rain a little harder....

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    9,930
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    I don't see the issue? Sounds like there's a $600K annual tax to own beachfront property in Salisbury Beach, MA?
    What if this whole crusade's a charade?
    And behind it all there's a price to be paid
    For the blood which we dine
    Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    2,872
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by triggerjerk View Post
    Was always amused by ordinances saying you have to build above the 100yr flood plain. Heck, I figger if'n it hasn't rained that hard in 100 yrs, it's about time for to rain a little harder....
    Gambler's Fallacy. A 100-year flood does not only happen once every 100 years.
    "We must all hang together, or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately."

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,052
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Unless you are on an island, beaches like what most think about aren't natural.

    We create and maintain them.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •