This will end up going sideways on the Guard, someone will shoot.
Failed Policy or a Planned?
This will end up going sideways on the Guard, someone will shoot.
Failed Policy or a Planned?
Both. They're being used as pawns to spark a violent response from Texas. The usual playbook.
Sent from my SM-A326U using Tapatalk
Very good coverage.
Shoot them. It'll stop REAL quick. Please spare me any morality lectures, I'm sick of this shit. They are invading vermin, treat them as such. You drop a few and the others will di di mau right back across the line, you won't have to do it a lot. Word will also spread that bum-rushing the border ain't gonna cut it.
Hell, even bayonets on those M4's would be useful, might not even have to shoot.
Last edited by ABNAK; 03-22-24 at 13:07.
11C2P '83-'87
Airborne Infantry
F**k China!
A friend who was a Marine a million years ago claimed to have been deployed in the Philippines to control riots with no bullets for their 16's. The Guard may have M4's, but do they have bullets?
Yes. Shoot them.
And FUKK the Democrats.
A true "Gun Guy" (or gal) should have familiarity and a modicum of proficiency with most all firearms platforms.
Actually, I assume this was fomented by the cartel operatives at the border. Do a night time visit on some mid level cartel people.
If you can’t shoot people literally assaulting US service people and breaching a border, when can you shoot them.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Bookmarks