Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: 2A Rights to Bearable Arms for Offense and Defense: Where do Drones fit in?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,451
    Feedback Score
    0

    2A Rights to Bearable Arms for Offense and Defense: Where do Drones fit in?

    So from Miller through Heller, we have set the precedent that we have an individual right to bearable arms that can be used for offensive and defensive purposes. Having seen the impact and use of drones in Ukraine, I wonder what kind of litigation we could see around people owning drones and what kind of capability they could have.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    2,767
    Feedback Score
    0
    Can't quote the exact FAR, but I'm positive that armed aircraft of any kind are off limits for civilians. I think it would be a heavy lift to see that change.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,864
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by utahjeepr View Post
    Can't quote the exact FAR, but I'm positive that armed aircraft of any kind are off limits for civilians. I think it would be a heavy lift to see that change.
    That is roughly what I've heard also. Mounting just a .22LR to your drone is extremely verboten.

    It would be kinda cool and all....
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    5,152
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Aren’t most of the drones there carrying grenades? That would be the first stumbling block.
    I am part of that power which eternally wills evil, and eternally works good.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,668
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have the constitutionally protected right to bear arms. Drones have no such right. As constitutional matter… Armed drone = No.
    Last edited by ChattanoogaPhil; 04-01-24 at 07:08.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    15,441
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I believe in order to arm any aircraft, you have to jump through some serious hoops, Law Enforcement for the most part cannot do it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,490
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    I seem to recall the FAA throwing a screaming hissyfit when a Philly PD chopper had one of the GIB's chuck a bomb out the side-door onto a house in the middle of a siege. Heck, you should see the bloody nuisance they make for just the propan-igniter simulated "machine guns" Commemorative Air Force uses and the "bomb" pyro for all their Pearl Harbor displays has to be placed groundside...

    Can't wait to hear how they Bitchy Little Girl that retired Marine pilot who just bought a UK-surplus Sea Harrier flyaway...
    Last edited by Diamondback; 04-01-24 at 09:05.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,856
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    What was advertised during the founding years of the country?

    https://www.madisonbrigade.com/t_coxe.htm

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,059
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Averageman View Post
    I believe in order to arm any aircraft, you have to jump through some serious hoops, Law Enforcement for the most part cannot do it.
    Seems bombs are OK though.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1985_MOVE_bombing

    The 1985 MOVE bombing, locally known by its date, May 13, 1985, was the destruction of residential homes in the Cobbs Creek neighborhood of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, by the Philadelphia Police Department during a standoff with MOVE, a black liberation organization. Philadelphia police dropped two explosive devices from a helicopter onto the roof of a house occupied by MOVE. The Philadelphia Police Department allowed the resulting fire to burn out of control, destroying 61 previously evacuated neighboring homes over two city blocks and leaving 250 people homeless. Six adults and five children were killed in the attack, with one adult and one child surviving. A lawsuit in federal court found that the city used excessive force and violated constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure.
    Last edited by SteyrAUG; 04-01-24 at 23:48.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •