Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Drones and strafing runs...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,100
    Feedback Score
    0

    Drones and strafing runs...

    Guess it was only a matter of time...

    "General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc (GA-ASI) has tested a podded gun on its Mojave short take-off and landing (STOL) unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), the company said in a 23 April release.

    GA-ASI mounted two Dillon DAP-6 podded miniguns to the Mojave and tested the combination at the Yuma Proving Ground in Arizona on 13 April. The Mojave performed seven gun-runs during two flights, expending around 10,000 rounds of ammunition against “a variety of targets”, according to GA-ASI. A video accompanying the release showed the UAV destroying a pickup truck."


    https://www.janes.com/defence-news/n...0to%20GA%2DASI.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    339
    Feedback Score
    0
    I am not surprised given that the Army just canceled the Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft (FARA). The FARA's predecessor the OH-58 Kiowa Warrior was retired and supposed to be replaced by drones.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,890
    Feedback Score
    0
    I thought that one of the advantages to a drone like the Predator was the ability to fly relatively high, undetected and with uber surveillance capabilities, and deliver a pinpoint strike with a Hellfire? Why fly low and take a chance on getting shot down?

    I will abstain from mentioning the possibility of where these might be used in the future. [wouldn't be a good look lobbing high explosives into an American domicile]
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,463
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ABNAK View Post
    I thought that one of the advantages to a drone like the Predator was the ability to fly relatively high, undetected and with uber surveillance capabilities, and deliver a pinpoint strike with a Hellfire? Why fly low and take a chance on getting shot down?

    I will abstain from mentioning the possibility of where these might be used in the future. [wouldn't be a good look lobbing high explosives into an American domicile]
    Because it’s M’n F’n cool…

    A hellfire isn’t always the answer. Sometimes you want to spread out the pain.

    Plus, seem like a cool and lower cost way of dealing with drones.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,093
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ABNAK View Post
    I thought that one of the advantages to a drone like the Predator was the ability to fly relatively high, undetected and with uber surveillance capabilities, and deliver a pinpoint strike with a Hellfire? Why fly low and take a chance on getting shot down?

    I will abstain from mentioning the possibility of where these might be used in the future. [wouldn't be a good look lobbing high explosives into an American domicile]
    I'm thinking a mini gun platform would be excellent in a close air support role. If a practical version with a large magazine capacity was developed that could be tasked by the troops under enemy fire a dozen or so that could be available short notice could really be a game changer.

    Right now we are in the era of recon drones and single strike drones, offensive gunship drones are the logical next step.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,890
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by FromMyColdDeadHand View Post
    Because it’s M’n F’n cool…

    A hellfire isn’t always the answer. Sometimes you want to spread out the pain.

    Plus, seem like a cool and lower cost way of dealing with drones.
    Let's say they fly at 250mph. Coming in low for a ground attack obviously makes them vulnerable to ground fire, with an Apache only edging it out by a little speed-wise. At 10K feet with several Hellfires on board it is a very survivable aerial "sniper platform" able to deliver a 20lb high-explosive warhead right on top of a bad guy's head.

    Now for anti-drone use? I dunno, we're in unchartered waters as far as that's concerned. I have no doubt that's where the technology is headed, but at this time it's theory.

    If they had a minigun mounted on a smaller "zip around" drone, and not a larger Predator-sized one, it might make more sense for ground support. Of course the mechanics/engineering to get a small drone to accommodate a 7.62 minigun is way beyond my non-existent design skills but I'm sure they're working on it.
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    339
    Feedback Score
    0
    Think of it as an unmanned version of the Sky Warden, only belonging to an Infantry BDE CDR, DIV CDR or CAB CDR. Lower cost, lighter weight lower level command authorities. Plus, 7.62mm is alot lighter, cheaper and easier to make then Hellfires.

    There is a major push to use less manned aircraft and more drones. So this could be a step to replace manned aircraft in the CAS role.

    However, the tested drone hasn't been purchased by anyone yet.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,592
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    What's the ammo capacity of each pod?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,093
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ABNAK View Post

    If they had a minigun mounted on a smaller "zip around" drone, and not a larger Predator-sized one, it might make more sense for ground support. Of course the mechanics/engineering to get a small drone to accommodate a 7.62 minigun is way beyond my non-existent design skills but I'm sure they're working on it.

    You have to do "big and clunky" proof of concept before you get to practical platforms.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    1,768
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ViniVidivici View Post
    What's the ammo capacity of each pod?
    That's my question. I'd worry about the drones being good for a single run, and that's it. Good CAS needs the ability to loiter, and make repeated runs if the intended targets don't oblige you and fall over after the first one.
    It's f*****g great, putting holes in people, all the time, and it just puts 'em down mate, they drop like sacks of s**t when they go down with this.
    --British veteran of the Ukraine War, discussing the FN SCAR H.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •