Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: Do you fight inside the ring or outside?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    52
    Feedback Score
    0
    I agree, with the setup you have on the Ultimak rail, you probably aren't going to see much difference as the scope never really gets that much closer to your eye.

    As I said before, it's about improving your performance. I wanted shooters to think about the placement of their optics and experiment with ways to improve their individual performance by moving the optic around. Find the way the works best for you. There is no "right" way.

    Good shooting,
    USSA-1
    Occupo Mens- Win the Fight
    United States Shooting Academy

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Medford, OR
    Posts
    137
    Feedback Score
    0
    I take it you have not timed the difference?

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    52
    Feedback Score
    0
    Yes, I evaluated the technique over several training sessions and competitive shooting events and it would save me anywhere from 1/4 to 3/4 of a sec. per target (depending on the distance between the targets.) More importantly for me, it not only saved me time, but I had better hits on the targets. I won't say the technique made me more accurate, but I got a better, longer look at the secondary target and I was able to get better hits.

    USSA-1
    Occupo Mens- Win the Fight
    United States Shooting Academy

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    NM
    Posts
    3,988
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    A slight, almost negligible, but in rare cases applicable point would be how much FOV the tube itself occludes - would mostly involve the firing side peripheral vision, and the crescent hidded by the tube.

    With my primary optic all the way back, I have a slight amount covered up that isn't seen by my non-dominant eye.
    So, I would want to move it forward until that area hidden by the tube is covered by my other eye, which only requires an inch or so of movement for the optic. For a non-NTCH shooter, this is much less noticeable.

    I end up with a compromise - most of the way forward on the receiver, because it helps with some of these advantages, but doesn't give me a tiny blind spot that I dislike, and is a rough middle ground between the far-forward easy to acquire dots, and more weight-practical rear mounting options.
    I think this reason is why the front 1/3 of the receiver are most commonly used rail slots.
    عندما تصبح الأسلحة محظورة, قد يملكون حظرون عندهم فقط
    کله چی سلاح منع شوی دی، یوازي غلوونکۍ یی به درلود
    Semper Fi
    "Being able to do the basics, on demand, takes practice. " - Sinister

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    52
    Feedback Score
    0
    Yep, I notice the same thing. This is one of the reasons I prefer EOTech's over Aimpoints. I can mount them further to the rear with less obstruction and they have a larger lens to fight through.

    USSA-1
    Occupo Mens- Win the Fight
    United States Shooting Academy

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •